CVE-2024-36233
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier Answer: are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session. Exploitation of this issue typically requires user interaction, such as convincing a victim to click on a malicious link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This client-side vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the victim's browser context through manipulation of the DOM, typically via malicious URL parameters or fragments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AEM installed versionAccess the AEM System Information console at /system/console/bundles or /crx/packmgr/service.jsp, or check the version.properties file in the installation directory. The version is also displayed on the AEM Welcome page under 'Version'.Affected if The version shown is 6.5.20 or earlier, or any version prior to the 2024.5 release train.
-
Confirm version from Maven or package manifestIf you have access to the source or package management, check the manifest.mf file in the AEM uber-jar or the version specified in your project's pom.xml dependencies.Affected if The declared AEM dependency version is below 6.5.21 or below the 2024.5 release.
-
Verify AEM instance accessibilityDetermine if the AEM instance is network-accessible (internet-facing or on an internal network) by checking firewall rules, load balancer configurations, or by attempting to access the login page from an external location.Affected if The instance is externally accessible without proper network segmentation, increasing the likelihood of targeted user attacks.
-
Review recent security audit logsCheck AEM access logs and security audit logs for unusual URL patterns containing JavaScript payloads in query parameters (e.g., <script>, javascript:, onerror=) or fragments that may indicate testing or exploitation attempts.
You are affected if your installed AEM version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or any version below the 2024.5 release train, especially if the instance is network-accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Apply Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.21 or later to address this vulnerability. Additionally, implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers and provide user awareness training regarding malicious links, as exploitation requires user interaction.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.21 (for 6.5.x line) or 2024.5 (for 2024.x line)
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in use (either 6.5.x or 2024.x release line)
- 2. For AEM 6.5.x users: Plan upgrade to version 6.5.21 or later
- 3. For AEM 2024.x users: Plan upgrade to version 2024.5 or later
- 4. Review Adobe's official upgrade documentation for your specific version
- 5. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- 6. After upgrade, verify that the XSS vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36233 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36233 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data