CVE-2024-36236
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier Answer: are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, such as convincing a victim to click on a specially crafted link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.20 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability where malicious JavaScript can be injected via specially crafted URLs. The payload executes client-side through DOM manipulation, allowing arbitrary code execution in the victim's browser context when they click a crafted link.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.21< 2024.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed AEM versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or check the version via the system console at /system/console/configMgr, or query the version endpoint if availableAffected if Version is 6.5.20 or earlier, or the 2024.x version is earlier than 2024.5
-
Confirm AEM edition and buildCheck the build information in the AEM About page (Help > About Adobe Experience Manager) or via the version.properties file in the installation directoryAffected if Build version is below 6.5.21 (for 6.5.x line) or below 2024.5 (for newer release line)
-
Identify exposed web endpointsReview web server access logs and AEM request logs for incoming requests that contain URL parameters being reflected in responses without sanitization. Focus on endpoints under /libs/, /apps/, or custom servlet pathsAffected if URL parameters are reflected directly in HTML responses without encoding or sanitization present in the response headers or body
-
Check for DOM manipulation patternsExamine the client-side JavaScript or the rendered HTML source when supplying test URL parameters (such as ?test=<script>alert(1)</script>) to public-facing AEM pages. Inspect the DOM using browser developer tools to see if parameter values are inserted into the pageAffected if URL parameter values appear in the DOM unmodified, indicating they are being processed and inserted without proper encoding
AEM installations are affected if they run version 6.5.20 or earlier, or any version prior to 2024.5, AND the vulnerable endpoint handling URL parameters is exposed and processes input without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.212024.5
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to a version beyond 6.5.20 (vendor patch), and implement URL parameter validation/sanitization on affected endpoints as a defense-in-depth measure.
AEM 6.5.21+ or AEM 2024.5+ (depending on which release track you're on)
- Backup your current Adobe Experience Manager instance and database
- Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.21 or later (for the 6.5.x release track), or to version 2024.5 or later (for the newer release track)
- After upgrading, clear the AEM cache and republished content as needed
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the AEM version in the About Adobe Experience Manager console
- Test that the DOM-based XSS vulnerability is no longer exploitable by attempting to inject malicious scripts via the affected vectors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36236 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36236 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data