CVE-2024-36444
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedcgi-bin/fdmcgiwebv2.cgi on Swissphone DiCal-RED 4009 devices allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to device logs.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe fdmcgiwebv2.cgi script on Swissphone DiCal-RED 4009 devices lacks authentication controls, allowing any unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive device logs through this CGI endpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelCheck the device label, web interface, or system information to confirm the device is a Swissphone DiCal-RED 4009Affected if The device is a Swissphone DiCal-RED 4009 model
-
Verify the CGI endpoint existsAttempt to access the URI /fdmcgiwebv2.cgi (or common variants like /cgi-bin/fdmcgiwebv2.cgi) on the device web serverAffected if The endpoint returns an HTTP response (200, 401, or other) indicating it exists on the device
-
Test for authentication bypassSend an HTTP request to the fdmcgiwebv2.cgi endpoint without providing any authentication credentials (no Authorization header, no session cookie, no login parameters)Affected if The endpoint returns HTTP 200 with content (such as log data) without requiring any login or credentials
-
Inspect returned content for sensitive dataExamine the response body from the unauthenticated request to determine if device logs, system messages, or other sensitive information are exposedAffected if Log files, system diagnostics, or sensitive device data are visible in the response without authentication
A user is affected if they have a Swissphone DiCal-RED 4009 device where the fdmcgiwebv2.cgi endpoint is accessible and returns sensitive log data without requiring any authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization controls on the fdmcgiwebv2.cgi endpoint, or network-segment the device management interface to prevent unauthorized external access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36444 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36444 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data