FortimanagerApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2024-36508

MEDIUM · 6.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.2.6 / 7.4.3 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.5 and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.5 CLI allows an authenticated admin user with diagnose privileges to delete files on the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer CLI allows an authenticated admin user with diagnose privileges to delete arbitrary files on the system by using directory traversal sequences in the file path.

MitigationUpgrade FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer to version 7.4.3 or later, or version 7.2.5 or later, to patch the path traversal vulnerability in the CLI.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortimanagerApplication
Affected:>= 6.4.0, < 7.2.6>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3
FortianalyzerApplication
Affected:>= 6.4.0, < 7.2.6>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the product and model
    Run 'get system status' in FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer CLI to confirm the product name and model number
    Affected if Product is FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer
  2. Check the installed firmware version
    Run 'get system status' in CLI and locate the 'Version' field. Compare against affected ranges: 6.4.0 to 7.2.5, or 7.4.0 to 7.4.2
    Affected if Version falls within 6.4.0 <= version < 7.2.6 OR 7.4.0 <= version < 7.4.3
  3. Verify admin user has diagnose privileges
    Run 'get admin user' in CLI and check the 'privilege' or 'ppm' field for the relevant admin account, or run 'diagnose autoupgrade versions' to test diagnose access
    Affected if Admin account has diagnose or privileged access enabled

User is affected if running FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer with version 6.4.0-7.2.5 or 7.4.0-7.4.2 and an admin account has diagnose privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.2.6 / 7.4.3 or later
Fixed in 7.2.67.4.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer to version 7.4.3 or later, or version 7.2.5 or later, to patch the path traversal vulnerability in the CLI.

Recommended fix High confidence

FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer 7.2.6 or later; 7.4.3 or later

  1. Identify current FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer version via web UI or CLI: `get system status`
  2. Determine appropriate upgrade path based on current version (7.2.x branch or 7.4.x branch)
  3. Back up current configuration using web UI or CLI: `execute backup config`
  4. Schedule maintenance window for upgrade
  5. Upgrade to FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer version 7.2.6 or higher, or 7.4.3 or higher
  6. After upgrade, verify version: `get system status`
  7. Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by ensuring diagnose privilege no longer allows arbitrary file deletion
Caveat Review Fortinet release notes for compatibility notes and potential configuration changes between versions

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fortimanager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36508 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36508 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data