CVE-2024-3682
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe WP STAGING and WP STAGING Pro plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions up to, and including, 3.4.3, and versions up to, and including, 5.4.3, respectively, via the ajaxSendReport function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from a log file, including system information and (in the Pro version) license keys. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to have used the 'Contact Us' functionality along with the "Enable this option to automatically submit the log files." option.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe WP STAGING and WP STAGING Pro plugins contain an unauthenticated sensitive information exposure vulnerability in the ajaxSendReport function. When an administrator uses the 'Contact Us' functionality with the automatic log submission option enabled, sensitive data including system information (and license keys in the Pro version) is written to log files. The ajaxSendReport function does not properly restrict access, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read these log files via the vulnerable function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WP STAGING plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for WP STAGING or WP STAGING Pro. Note the installed version number displayed there.Affected if The plugin is installed and the version is unpatched (compare to vendor's security advisory for fixed version)
-
Check if automatic log submission is enabledIn WordPress admin, navigate to WP STAGING settings. Look for the 'Contact Us' or 'Support' section and check whether the option to 'automatically submit log files' or similar is enabled.Affected if The automatic log submission option is turned ON, as this is required for the vulnerable code path to write sensitive data to logs
-
Locate log files created by the pluginAccess the WordPress wp-content directory via FTP or file manager. Look for log files in common locations such as wp-content/uploads/wp-staging/logs/, wp-content/debug.log, or similar paths. Check for files with names containing 'log', 'staging', or 'debug'.Affected if Log files exist in the wp-content directory or subdirectories, as these may contain the exposed system information or license keys
-
Inspect log file contents for sensitive dataOpen any found log files and search for sensitive patterns: system paths, PHP version info, database credentials references, license key strings (typically alphanumeric in Pro version), or WP STAGING configuration details.Affected if Log files contain system information, license keys, or other sensitive configuration data that should not be publicly accessible
-
Verify unauthenticated access to ajaxSendReportTest by sending a direct POST request to your site's wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with action=wpstg_ajaxSendReport and observe if the server responds without requiring authentication.Affected if The ajaxSendReport function responds to unauthenticated requests, confirming the access control weakness exists
You are affected if WP STAGING with automatic log submission enabled is running an unpatched version and log files containing sensitive data are accessible to unauthenticated users via the ajaxSendReport function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate WP STAGING and WP STAGING Pro to the latest patched versions. As a temporary measure, disable the 'automatically submit the log files' option in plugin settings. Consider rotating any exposed license keys or credentials found in log files.
WP STAGING free: 3.4.4+ | WP STAGING Pro: 5.4.4+
- Upgrade WP STAGING (free) plugin to version 3.4.4 or later
- Upgrade WP STAGING Pro plugin to version 5.4.4 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3682 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3682 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data