CVE-2024-3699
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of hard-coded password to the patients' database allows an attacker to retrieve sensitive data stored in the database. The password is the same among all drEryk Gabinet installations.This issue affects drEryk Gabinet software versions from 7.0.0.0 through 9.17.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe drEryk Gabinet medical software versions 7.0.0.0 through 9.17.0.0 contain a hard-coded password embedded in the application code that provides direct access to the patient database. Since this identical password is used across all installations, any attacker who obtains or guesses this password can access sensitive patient health records and personal identifiable information (PII) stored in the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0.0, < 9.17.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Dreryk Gabinet versionCheck the application version through the software's About section, installation directory metadata, or Windows Programs and Features. Compare the version number to the affected range: 7.0.0.0 through 9.17.0.0.Affected if The installed version falls within the range >= 7.0.0.0 and < 9.17.0.0
-
Locate application executable and configuration filesSearch the Dreryk Gabinet installation directory for executable files (.exe), configuration files (.config, .xml, .ini), and any embedded resources. Common locations include C:\Program Files\Dreryk\Gabinet or the application's default installation path.Affected if Application files are found in the installation directory
-
Inspect application binaries for hardcoded credentialsSearch within the application executable files, DLLs, or configuration files for hardcoded password strings. Use a text search or hex editor to look for database connection strings containing password fields.Affected if A hardcoded password is found embedded in the application code or configuration files
-
Verify database connection uses hardcoded credentialAttempt to connect to the patient database using the discovered hardcoded password from the application code. Check if the database accepts this credential for authentication.Affected if The database accepts authentication using the hardcoded password found in the application
-
Review database access controlsExamine the database user accounts and authentication method configured for the Dreryk Gabinet application. Determine if the application uses a shared credential across installations.Affected if The database is configured with a hardcoded credential shared across installations rather than unique per-installation credentials
You are affected if Dreryk Gabinet version 7.0.0.0 through 9.17.0.0 is installed AND the application contains a hardcoded password that provides direct database access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.17.0.0
Replace the hardcoded password with a secure credential management system (e.g., environment variables, secrets manager, or encrypted configuration) and force password rotation on all existing installations. Consider auditing database access logs for unauthorized access since the vulnerability has been publicly disclosed.
9.17.0.0
- 1. Backup the current Gabinet installation and database.
- 2. Download the fixed version (9.17.0.0) from the official vendor source.
- 3. Stop the Gabinet service.
- 4. Upgrade the Gabinet installation to version 9.17.0.0.
- 5. Start the Gabinet service.
- 6. Verify the application functions correctly and the hard-coded password has been removed or changed.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3699 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3699 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data