CVE-2024-37041
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained administrator access to execute code. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 and later QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems. Exploitation requires an attacker who already has gained administrator-level access to the system, which then allows remote code execution. The vulnerability stems from inadequate bounds checking during a buffer copy operation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0.2737= 5.2.0.2744= 5.2.0.2782= 5.2.0.2802= 5.2.0.2823= 5.2.0.2851= 5.2.0.2860= h5.2.0.2737= h5.2.0.2782= h5.2.0.2789= h5.2.0.2802= h5.2.0.2823= h5.2.0.2851= h5.2.0.2860CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify QTS or QuTS hero versionAccess the QNAP admin console (QTS Manager or QuTS hero web interface) and navigate to Control Panel > System > Firmware, or use the command line and run 'getcfg system version' to retrieve the firmware build numberAffected if The displayed version matches any of these QTS builds: 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802, 5.2.0.2823, 5.2.0.2851, 5.2.0.2860 OR matches any of these QuTS hero builds: h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802, h5.2.0.2823, h5.2.0.2851, h5.2.0.2860
-
Verify administrator access exposureReview whether the QNAP administrative interface (HTTPS port 8080 or 443) is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet, and confirm the strength of administrator account credentialsAffected if The administrative web interface is accessible from untrusted networks or uses weak administrator credentials, because exploitation requires an attacker with existing administrator-level access
-
Confirm vulnerable service statusThis vulnerability exists in the core QTS/QuTS hero operating system itself rather than a specific optional service; no additional service enablement check is required as the flaw is in the operating system buffer handlingAffected if The device is running an affected QTS or QuTS hero version regardless of which features are enabled, since the vulnerability is in the base operating system
Your environment is affected if the QNAP device runs QTS or QuTS hero with a build number matching exactly any of the listed affected versions, and an attacker could obtain administrator-level access to the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected QNAP devices to QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later, or QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later. Since exploitation requires administrator access, ensure strong administrator credentials and restrict administrative interfaces to trusted networks.
QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later; QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later
- 1. Identify the current QTS or QuTS hero version running on the QNAP device
- 2. If the version is one of the affected versions (QTS 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802 or QuTS hero h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802), plan for an upgrade
- 3. Back up critical data following QNAP best practices before performing the upgrade
- 4. For QTS systems: upgrade to QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later
- 5. For QuTS hero systems: upgrade to QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the system is running the patched version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37041 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37041 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data