CVE-2024-37044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained administrator access to execute code. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 and later QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems allows remote code execution by attackers who have already compromised administrator-level access to the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0.2737= 5.2.0.2744= 5.2.0.2782= 5.2.0.2802= 5.2.0.2823= 5.2.0.2851= 5.2.0.2860= h5.2.0.2737= h5.2.0.2782= h5.2.0.2789= h5.2.0.2802= h5.2.0.2823= h5.2.0.2851= h5.2.0.2860CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the QNAP operating system typeLog into the QNAP admin interface and navigate to Control Panel > System > System Status, or run 'uname -a' via SSH to determine if the system is running QTS or QuTS heroAffected if The system is not QNAP QTS or QuTS hero (the vulnerability only affects these two products)
-
Find the installed QTS version and build numberIn the admin web interface, go to Control Panel > System > System Status > Firmware Version, or run the command 'grep -i version /etc/config/sysovi.conf' via SSHAffected if The displayed build number is one of: 2737, 2744, 2782, 2802, 2823, 2851, or 2860
-
Find the installed QuTS hero version and build numberIn the admin web interface, go to Control Panel > System > System Status > Firmware Version, or run the command 'grep -i version /etc/config/sysovi.conf' via SSHAffected if The displayed build number is one of: 2737, 2782, 2789, 2802, 2823, 2851, or 2860
-
Confirm administrator access statusReview user accounts with administrative privileges in Control Panel > Privilege > Users, and check for any unauthorized or unexpected admin accountsAffected if There are unexpected administrator-level accounts or evidence of compromise (this vulnerability requires prior admin access)
A user is affected if their QTS or QuTS hero build matches any of the listed vulnerable versions AND an attacker already has administrator-level access to the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate QTS to version 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later, or QuTS hero to version h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later. Until patched, strictly limit administrator access and monitor for suspicious administrative activity.
QTS 5.2.1.2930 (build 20241025 or later) for QTS systems; QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 (build 20241025 or later) for QuTS hero systems
- 1. Identify the current QNAP OS version by logging into the QNAP admin interface and checking System Settings > System > About
- 2. Confirm whether the system is running QTS or QuTS hero
- 3. If running QTS version 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, or 5.2.0.2802, initiate upgrade to QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later
- 4. If running QuTS hero version h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, or h5.2.0.2802, initiate upgrade to QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later
- 5. Perform the upgrade through the QNAP Control Panel > System > Firmware Update
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful and the system is running a fixed version
- 7. Confirm the build date is 20241025 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data