CVE-2024-37047
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained administrator access to execute code. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 and later QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer copy without checking size vulnerability in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary code. This is a classic buffer overflow where the application copies data into a buffer without validating the input size, potentially leading to memory corruption and code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0.2737= 5.2.0.2744= 5.2.0.2782= 5.2.0.2802= 5.2.0.2823= 5.2.0.2851= 5.2.0.2860= h5.2.0.2737= h5.2.0.2782= h5.2.0.2789= h5.2.0.2802= h5.2.0.2823= h5.2.0.2851= h5.2.0.2860CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check QTS firmware version via web interfaceLog into QTS admin console, go to Control Panel > System Administration > Firmware Update, and note the displayed version number and buildAffected if The version matches 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802, 5.2.0.2823, 5.2.0.2851, or 5.2.0.2860
-
Check QTS version via command lineAccess the NAS via SSH and run: `version` or `cat /etc/config/version`Affected if The version output matches any of the affected QTS versions listed above
-
Check QuTS hero firmware version via web interfaceLog into QuTS hero admin console, navigate to Control Panel > System Administration > Firmware Update, and record the version and build numberAffected if The version matches h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802, h5.2.0.2823, h5.2.0.2851, or h5.2.0.2860
-
Check QuTS hero version via command lineAccess the NAS via SSH and run: `version` or `cat /etc/config/version`Affected if The version output matches any of the affected QuTS hero versions listed above
-
Verify remote administrative access is exposedIn the admin console, go to Control Panel > Security > Security Level, or check if the admin web interface (port 808 or 443) is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The administrative interface is reachable from external networks without VPN restrictions
If the installed QTS or QuTS hero version matches any of the specific build numbers in the affected list AND administrative access is exposed, the environment is vulnerable to remote authenticated code execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade affected QNAP devices to QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later, or QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later. Until upgraded, restrict administrative access to trusted personnel only and monitor for suspicious admin activity.
QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later; QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later
- Identify current QTS or QuTS hero version in use (System Settings > About > Firmware Version)
- If running QTS version 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, or 5.2.0.2802, upgrade to QTS 5.2.1.2930 build 20241025 or later
- If running QuTS hero version h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, or h5.2.0.2802, upgrade to QuTS hero h5.2.1.2929 build 20241025 or later
- Access Control Panel > System > Firmware Update and use 'Check for Update' or manually download the update from QNAP website
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the new firmware version matches the fixed releases
- Review administrator accounts and ensure no unauthorized access occurred (the vulnerability requires prior administrator access)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37047 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37047 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data