CVE-2024-37051
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitHub access token could be exposed to third-party sites in JetBrains IDEs after version 2023.1 and less than: IntelliJ IDEA 2023.1.7, 2023.2.7, 2023.3.7, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 EAP3; Aqua 2024.1.2; CLion 2023.1.7, 2023.2.4, 2023.3.5, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 EAP2; DataGrip 2023.1.3, 2023.2.4, 2023.3.5, 2024.1.4; DataSpell 2023.1.6, 2023.2.7, 2023.3.6, 2024.1.2, 2024.2 EAP1; GoLand 2023.1.6, 2023.2.7, 2023.3.7, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 EAP3; MPS 2023.2.1, 2023.3.1, 2024.1 EAP2; PhpStorm 2023.1.6, 2023.2.6, 2023.3.7, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 EAP3; PyCharm 2023.1.6, 2023.2.7, 2023.3.6, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 EAP2; Rider 2023.1.7, 2023.2.5, 2023.3.6, 2024.1.3; RubyMine 2023.1.7, 2023.2.7, 2023.3.7, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 EAP4; RustRover 2024.1.1; WebStorm 2023.1.6, 2023.2.7, 2023.3.7, 2024.1.4
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitHub access tokens stored in JetBrains IDEs were being leaked to third-party sites. The IDEs were likely including authentication credentials in HTTP requests (headers, query parameters, or referrer fields) when making outbound connections to non-GitHub domains, exposing tokens intended solely for GitHub API authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2024.1.2< 2023.1.7>= 2023.2.0, < 2023.2.4>= 2023.3.0, < 2023.3.5>= 2024.1.0, < 2024.1.3>= 2023.1.0, < 2023.1.3>= 2023.2.0, < 2023.2.4>= 2023.3.0, < 2023.3.5>= 2024.1.0, < 2024.1.4< 2023.1.6>= 2023.2.0, < 2023.2.7>= 2023.3.0, < 2023.3.6>= 2024.1.0, < 2024.1.2< 2023.1.6>= 2023.2.0, < 2023.2.7>= 2023.3.0, < 2023.3.7>= 2024.1.0, < 2024.1.3< 2023.1.7>= 2023.2.0, < 2023.2.7>= 2023.3.0, < 2023.3.7>= 2024.1.0, < 2024.1.3< 2023.2.1= 2023.3.0< 2023.1.6>= 2023.2.0, < 2023.2.6>= 2023.3.0, < 2023.3.7>= 2024.1.0, < 2024.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed JetBrains IDE product and versionOpen the IDE, go to Help → About and note the product name and exact version number (e.g., IntelliJ IDEA 2023.2.5)Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected ranges for that product
-
Confirm GitHub token authentication is configuredIn the IDE, go to Settings → Version Control → GitHub and check if any GitHub accounts or personal access tokens are linkedAffected if A GitHub account or token is added and the IDE version is vulnerable
-
Check for recent outbound HTTP requests to non-GitHub domainsReview IDE logs, network traffic logs, or proxy logs for HTTP requests that include GitHub tokens in headers, query parameters, or referrer fields going to non-github.com domainsAffected if Any such requests are found in logs or traffic captures
You are affected if you use any of the listed JetBrains IDEs at a version within the specified ranges and have GitHub tokens configured in the IDE, as the token may have been leaked to third-party sites.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2023.1.32023.1.62023.1.7
Update all affected JetBrains IDE installations to the patched versions specified in the advisory. Additionally, revoke and regenerate any GitHub access tokens that may have been used with these IDE versions as they may be compromised.
Upgrade to the fixed version for your product: Aqua 2024.1.2+, CLion 2023.1.7+/2023.2.4+/2023.3.5+/2024.1.3+, DataGrip 2023.1.3+/2023.2.4+/2023.3.5+/2024.1.4+, DataSpell 2023.1.6+/2023.2.7+/2023.3.6+/2024.1.2+, GoLand 2023.1.6+/2023.2.7+/2023.3.7+/2024.1.3+, IntelliJ IDEA 2023.1.7+/2023.2.7+/2023.3.
- 1. Identify the JetBrains IDE product and current version in use (Help > About)
- 2. Determine if the current version falls within the affected version ranges listed for the specific product
- 3. If affected, download the fixed version from the official JetBrains website (www.jetbrains.com) or use the JetBrains Toolbox app
- 4. Install the fixed version which includes the patch for CVE-2024-37051
- 5. After upgrading, verify that GitHub access tokens are no longer exposed to third-party sites by reviewing the IDE's GitHub authentication settings
- 6. Consider rotating any GitHub access tokens that may have been used in the affected versions as a precautionary measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37051 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37051 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data