James ServerApplication · Apache

CVE-2024-37358

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.7.6 / 3.8.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Similarly to CVE-2024-34055, Apache James is vulnerable to denial of service through the abuse of IMAP literals from both authenticated and unauthenticated users, which could be used to cause unbounded memory allocation and very long computations Version 3.7.6 and 3.8.2 restrict such illegitimate use of IMAP literals.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache James IMAP server is vulnerable to denial of service through abuse of IMAP literals, allowing both authenticated and unauthenticated users to send specially crafted requests that cause unbounded memory allocation and very long computations, similar to CVE-2024-34055.

MitigationUpgrade Apache James to version 3.7.6 or 3.8.2 which restricts illegitimate use of IMAP literals.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
James ServerApplication
Affected:< 3.7.6>= 3.8.0, < 3.8.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache James Server version
    Check the James server version by examining the startup logs, the lib/ directory for jar file versions, or run: java -jar james-server.jar --version. Compare against affected ranges: < 3.7.6 or >= 3.8.0, < 3.8.2
    Affected if The installed version falls within < 3.7.6 or >= 3.8.0, < 3.8.2
  2. Confirm IMAP service is enabled
    Verify the IMAP protocol is enabled in the James configuration. Check conf/imapserver.xml or the active configuration for imapEnabled=true, and verify the IMAP port (default 143) is listening
    Affected if IMAP service is enabled and listening on a network port
  3. Check IMAP network exposure
    Run netstat or ss to confirm port 143 (IMAP) or 993 (IMAPS) is open and bound to a network interface accessible to users. Example: netstat -tlnp | grep -E ':(143|993)'
    Affected if IMAP ports are exposed to network traffic, allowing specially crafted literal requests to reach the server

The environment is affected if running Apache James version less than 3.7.6 or between 3.8.0 and 3.8.2 (exclusive) with IMAP service enabled and network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.7.6 / 3.8.2 or later
Fixed in 3.7.63.8.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache James to version 3.7.6 or 3.8.2 which restricts illegitimate use of IMAP literals.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.7.6 or 3.8.2 (or later stable releases)

  1. Identify the current Apache James version by checking server logs or configuration files
  2. If running version < 3.7.6, upgrade to version 3.7.6 or later (preferably latest 3.7.x release)
  3. If running version >= 3.8.0 but < 3.8.2, upgrade to version 3.8.2 or later (preferably latest 3.8.x release)
  4. Review Apache James upgrade documentation for your version
  5. Backup current configuration and data before upgrading
  6. Perform the upgrade following official Apache James upgrade procedures
  7. Verify the upgrade was successful and test IMAP functionality
Caveat The fix restricts illegitimate use of IMAP literals - test that legitimate IMAP operations function correctly after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in James Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37358 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37358 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data