CVE-2024-37362
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. (CWE-522) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.8, including 8.3.x, discloses database passwords when saving connections to RedShift. Products must not disclose sensitive information without cause. Disclosure of sensitive information can lead to further exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics stores database credentials insecurely when saving RedShift connections, exposing plaintext or weakly protected passwords (CWE-522). Affected versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.8, including 8.3.x, allow unauthorized retrieval of stored database passwords.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Pentaho Data Integration versionCheck the product version in the installation directory, typically in a version file or about dialog. Common locations include 'version.properties' or check the manifest file in the Pentaho installation folder.Affected if The installed version is 8.3.x, or is before 9.3.0.8, or is before 10.2.0.0 (all vulnerable ranges)
-
Locate RedShift connection configurationsSearch the Pentaho user workspace or repository for files containing RedShift connection settings. These are typically stored in XML files with names like '*.kdb' or connection XML files, often under the '.pentaho' or 'pentaho-solutions' directories in the user home folder.Affected if RedShift connection configuration files exist in the environment
-
Inspect stored credentials for plaintext exposureOpen the RedShift connection configuration files and examine the password field values. Look for passwords stored in plaintext or using weak encoding (base64 without encryption).Affected if Passwords appear as readable plaintext or use only basic encoding without proper encryption protection
-
Verify credential protection mechanismExamine the connection configuration XML or properties files for the protection level of password fields. Check for attributes like 'protected' or 'encrypt' and verify the actual storage method.Affected if Password protection is set to 'none', 'plain', or uses a weak protection mechanism that allows retrieval in readable form
The environment is affected if Pentaho Data Integration version is 8.3.x, before 9.3.0.8, or before 10.2.0.0, AND RedShift connections with weakly protected credentials exist in the configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Pentaho Data Integration to version 10.2.0.0 or 9.3.0.8 or later to obtain the security fix. Review and re-save existing RedShift connection configurations to ensure credentials are properly protected with the patched version.
Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics 10.2.0.0 (or 9.3.0.8 as alternative)
- 1. Back up your existing Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics installation, including all repositories, jobs, and transformation files.
- 2. Download the fixed version: Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics 10.2.0.0 (recommended) or version 9.3.0.8 from Hitachi Vantara's official download portal.
- 3. Stop the Pentaho server and any running Carte slaves.
- 4. Install the new version following the official Pentaho installation guide for your platform.
- 5. Migrate your existing repositories, configuration files, and custom plugins to the new installation.
- 6. Verify that the RedShift connection configuration no longer exposes passwords in plain text by creating a new RedShift connection and inspecting the saved configuration file.
- 7. Restart the Pentaho server and validate that existing jobs and transformations function correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37362 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37362 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data