Lawyer Landing PageWordPress extension · Rarathemes

CVE-2024-37503

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.2.5 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raratheme Lawyer Landing Page lawyer-landing-page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Lawyer Landing Page: from n/a through <= 1.2.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the raratheme Lawyer Landing Page WordPress theme (versions through 1.2.4) allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions such as modifying theme settings or plugin configurations due to missing or inadequate anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing forms and AJAX endpoints.

MitigationUpdate Lawyer Landing Page theme to version 1.2.5 or later which should include proper CSRF token validation; alternatively, add WordPress nonces to all forms and AJAX actions and verify the nonce on submission.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Lawyer Landing PageWordPress extension
Affected:< 1.2.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed theme version
    Check the theme version in the WordPress admin panel under Appearance > Themes, or inspect the style.css file in the theme directory for the 'Version' header
    Affected if The theme version is listed as 1.2.4 or lower (any version before 1.2.5)
  2. Locate theme form handlers
    Inspect the theme PHP files (commonly functions.php or files in includes/ or admin/ directories) that handle form submissions for theme settings or configurations
    Affected if Forms that modify theme settings or plugin configurations do not contain WordPress nonce fields (look for wp_nonce_field or wp_nonce_url functions)
  3. Inspect AJAX endpoint registration
    Review PHP files that register AJAX actions (search for add_action('wp_ajax_') or add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_') calls) to identify state-changing AJAX endpoints
    Affected if AJAX endpoints lack nonce verification (check for check_ajax_referer or wp_verify_nonce calls before processing requests)
  4. Verify nonce validation logic
    Examine the code that processes form submissions and AJAX requests to confirm that nonces are validated before any state-changing operations occur
    Affected if No verification of nonce tokens is performed, or verification is missing entirely before executing settings changes or configuration updates

A user is affected if the Lawyer Landing Page theme version is below 1.2.5 AND the theme's forms and AJAX endpoints lack proper CSRF token (nonce) validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.2.5 or later
Fixed in 1.2.5
Interim mitigation

Update Lawyer Landing Page theme to version 1.2.5 or later which should include proper CSRF token validation; alternatively, add WordPress nonces to all forms and AJAX actions and verify the nonce on submission.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.2.5

  1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. Find the 'Lawyer Landing Page' plugin by raratheme
  4. Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually update to version 1.2.5
  5. Verify the plugin version shows 1.2.5 after updating

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Lawyer Landing Page Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37503 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37503 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data