OpenharmonyOperating system · Openatom

CVE-2024-3759

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
in OpenHarmony v4.0.0 and prior versions allow a local attacker arbitrary code execution in TCB through use after free.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A use-after-free vulnerability in OpenHarmony v4.0.0 and prior versions allows a local attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution within the Trusted Computing Base (TCB). The vulnerability stems from improper memory management where memory is accessed after being freed, leading to potential code execution in the most privileged system component.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches for OpenHarmony to address the use-after-free vulnerability in TCB components; until patched, minimize local attack surface and restrict access to untrusted applications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenharmonyOperating system
Affected:< 4.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm OpenHarmony is installed
    Check the operating system name and version information on the device or system. On OpenHarmony devices, this is typically found in system settings under 'About device' or by checking the system properties file.
    Affected if The system is running OpenHarmony as its operating system
  2. Identify the installed OpenHarmony version
    Retrieve the exact version number of the OpenHarmony installation. This can be done through system information utilities, build.prop files, or device information menus depending on the device form factor.
    Affected if The installed version is anything less than 4.0.1 (e.g., 4.0.0, 3.x versions, or earlier)
  3. Verify the TCB component is present
    Check if Trusted Computing Base (TCB) components are enabled or running on the system. This may involve reviewing active system services or security-related modules that operate at the highest privilege level.
    Affected if TCB components are present and operational on the affected version
  4. Confirm local access to the system
    Verify that local attacker access is possible by checking which users or processes have shell or terminal access to the device.
    Affected if Untrusted local users or processes can execute commands on the system

A system is affected if it runs OpenHarmony version 4.0.0 or any prior version, has TCB components active, and allows local attacker access to the system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.0.1 or later
Fixed in 4.0.1
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches for OpenHarmony to address the use-after-free vulnerability in TCB components; until patched, minimize local attack surface and restrict access to untrusted applications.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

OpenHarmony 4.0.1

  1. Upgrade OpenHarmony to version 4.0.1 or later to resolve the use-after-free vulnerability
  2. Verify the upgrade by checking the system version after the update completes
  3. Review the OpenHarmony 4.0.1 release notes to confirm the vulnerability fix is included
Caveat Review 4.0.1 release notes for any compatibility considerations with your existing applications and subsystems

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Openharmony Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $5,940
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3759 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3759 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data