CVE-2024-37758
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in the endpoint /RoleMenuMapping/AddRoleMenu of Digiteam v4.21.0.0 allows authenticated attackers to escalate privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDigiteam v4.21.0.0 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the /RoleMenuMapping/AddRoleMenu endpoint. Authenticated attackers can exploit this endpoint to escalate privileges, likely by assigning themselves unauthorized menu/role permissions. This is a classic privilege escalation due to missing or insufficient authorization checks on a role management function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Digiteam versionLocate the installed Digiteam version in the application UI (typically under About, Help, or System Information sections) or check the installation files/directory for version metadataAffected if The installed version is v4.21.0.0 or earlier
-
Confirm RoleMenuMapping endpoint existsVerify that the /RoleMenuMapping/AddRoleMenu endpoint is present and accessible in the deployed Digiteam instance by checking the application's routing configuration or API documentationAffected if The endpoint exists and is reachable in the application
-
Test endpoint authorizationUsing a non-administrator authenticated account, attempt to submit a request to the /RoleMenuMapping/AddRoleMenu endpoint to observe whether the request is accepted or rejectedAffected if The request succeeds without proper authorization checks, indicating the vulnerability is present
-
Review role-menu assignmentsInspect the current role-menu mapping configuration through the admin interface or database to identify any unexpected or unauthorized privilege assignmentsAffected if Non-administrator accounts have been assigned elevated menu or role permissions they should not possess
-
Check audit logs for AddRoleMenu accessSearch Digiteam's audit or access logs for any invocations of the AddRoleMenu endpoint, noting which accounts initiated them and whether they are authorized administratorsAffected if Logs show AddRoleMenu activity from accounts that should not have access to role management functions
You are affected if running Digiteam v4.21.0.0 or earlier where the /RoleMenuMapping/AddRoleMenu endpoint accepts requests from authenticated users without proper authorization enforcement.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch for Digiteam v4.21.0.0 when available, and in the interim implement proper role-based authorization validation on the AddRoleMenu endpoint to ensure only authorized administrators can modify role-menu mappings.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37758 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37758 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data