CVE-2024-3782
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in WBSAirback 21.02.04, which could allow an attacker to create a manipulated HTML form to perform privileged actions once it is executed by a privileged user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WBSAirback version 21.02.04 allows remote attackers to trick authenticated privileged users into executing unintended privileged actions through maliciously crafted HTML forms. The vulnerability stems from missing or inadequate CSRF protections, enabling attackers to forge authenticated requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.02.04CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WBSAirback versionAccess the WBSAirback administration interface or check system information to confirm the installed version is exactly 21.02.04Affected if The installed version is 21.02.04 and no patches have been applied
-
Inspect session cookies for SameSite attributeLog into WBSAirback, open browser developer tools, examine session cookies for the SameSite attribute (check cookies for the WBSAirback domain)Affected if Session cookies lack SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax attributes
-
Review form submissions for anti-CSRF tokensAccess state-changing forms (user management, configuration, backup operations) within the WBSAirback interface, view page source or inspect form elements for hidden CSRF token fieldsAffected if Forms contain no hidden CSRF token fields or tokens are missing from POST requests
-
Check API endpoints for CSRF protectionReview any AJAX or API endpoints that perform state-changing operations; examine request headers and parameters for token validationAffected if API endpoints accept requests without CSRF token validation in headers or body
-
Verify Origin/Referer header validationSend a test request with a different Origin header (e.g., via curl or Burp) to sensitive endpoints and observe if the request is rejectedAffected if Requests with mismatched Origin headers are processed without rejection
You are affected if running WBSAirback version 21.02.04 and any of the following are true: session cookies lack SameSite attributes, forms missing anti-CSRF tokens, or Origin/Referer headers are not validated on sensitive requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and configure SameSite cookie attributes. Additionally, validate Origin/Referer headers and ensure session tokens are validated on sensitive POST requests.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3782 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3782 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data