CVE-2024-37825
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in EnvisionWare Computer Access & Reservation Control SelfCheck v1.0 (fixed in OneStop 3.2.0.27184 Hotfix May 2024) allows unauthenticated attackers on the same network to perform a directory traversal.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEnvisionWare Computer Access & Reservation Control SelfCheck v1.0 contains a directory traversal vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers on the same network to access files outside the web root through specially crafted path sequences in HTTP requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm EnvisionWare SelfCheck installationCheck for the presence of EnvisionWare SelfCheck software on the system. Common installation paths may include C:\Program Files\EnvisionWare\ or C:\EnvisionWare\. Look for executable files named SelfCheck or related service processes in Task Manager.Affected if The software is installed and the version is 1.0 or unpatched (versions prior to the May 2024 hotfix 3.2.0.27184).
-
Identify installed version numberOpen Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\EnvisionWare\ or check the software's About/Version information typically accessible through the application or its service properties. Alternatively, check the version details in Add/Remove Programs.Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or falls below the patched version 3.2.0.27184.
-
Verify web service is enabledCheck if the SelfCheck web interface service is running. Look for IIS Express, Apache, or the built-in web server process associated with EnvisionWare listening on HTTP/HTTPS ports (commonly port 8080 or 80). Use 'netstat -an' to identify listening ports.Affected if The web service is running and accessible, exposing the HTTP interface to network requests.
-
Assess network exposureReview firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the web service port is accessible from network segments other than trusted internal networks. Check if the service binds to 0.0.0.0 or all interfaces versus localhost only.Affected if The service port is open to untrusted network segments or the attacker's machine is on the same network as the vulnerable service.
-
Review HTTP access logs for traversal attemptsExamine web server access logs for unusual path sequences such as '../', '..\', or absolute path requests outside the web root (e.g., '/..', '/windows/system32'). Log locations may be in the application or web server logs directory.Affected if Evidence exists of directory traversal requests targeting system files outside the web root directory.
The environment is affected if EnvisionWare Computer Access & Reservation Control SelfCheck version 1.0 is installed, the web service is enabled and network-accessible, and the system has not been patched with the May 2024 hotfix 3.2.0.27184.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the OneStop 3.2.0.27184 Hotfix May 2024 to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, network segmentation should be implemented to restrict access to the affected service to only trusted network segments.
OneStop 3.2.0.27184 Hotfix May 2024
- Contact EnvisionWare support to obtain the OneStop 3.2.0.27184 Hotfix May 2024
- Apply the hotfix to the affected EnvisionWare Computer Access & Reservation Control SelfCheck v1.0 installation
- Verify the patch has been applied successfully by checking the software version
- Test the application to confirm the directory traversal vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37825 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37825 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data