Classic Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-120

CVE-2024-37861

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Open Robotics Robotic Operating System 2 (ROS2) and Nav2 humble versions were discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the nav2_amcl process. This vulnerability is triggered via sending a crafted .yaml file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the nav2_amcl (Adaptive Monte Carlo Localization) process of ROS2 and Nav2 humble versions. The vulnerability is triggered by processing a maliciously crafted .yaml configuration file, which can cause memory corruption and potentially allow arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpgrade to patched versions of Nav2 humble and ROS2 when available. Until then, ensure only trusted .yaml configuration files are loaded into nav2_amcl and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify nav2_amcl package installation
    Run 'ros2 pkg list | grep -i amcl' or 'ros2 pkg list | grep -i nav2' to list installed navigation packages. Then check version with 'ros2 pkg version <package_name>' if available, or inspect /opt/ros/humble/share/nav2_amcl/package.xml
    Affected if The nav2_amcl package is installed and its version falls within Nav2 humble release range without patches applied
  2. Verify if amcl node is running
    Run 'ros2 node list' to list active nodes, then 'ros2 node info /amcl' if found. Also check with 'ros2 process list' for any amcl-related processes
    Affected if The amcl node is actively running and processing configuration parameters
  3. Locate YAML configuration files used by amcl
    Inspect launch files or parameter files: run 'ros2 param dump /amcl' to see current parameters, check launch files in the workspace (typically .launch.py or .launch.xml files) that load YAML configs for amcl, look for 'amcl' parameter file declarations
    Affected if YAML configuration files are being loaded by the amcl node without validation
  4. Check amcl parameter loading mechanism
    Examine how parameters are loaded: look for 'ros2 param load' commands, check launch file arguments for 'params' file paths, inspect if YAML files are loaded from network or writable locations
    Affected if YAML files are loaded from untrusted sources or without schema validation before being passed to amcl
  5. Assess network exposure of amcl service
    Run 'ros2 topic list' to see exposed topics. Check if DDS/RMW network settings allow remote connections. Inspect if the system is on a shared network where untrusted YAML files could be injected
    Affected if The ROS2 domain/network is accessible to untrusted systems and amcl accepts remote parameter updates

You are affected if Nav2 humble with nav2_amcl is running and processes YAML configuration files without validation, especially if the ROS2 network is accessible to untrusted parties.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to patched versions of Nav2 humble and ROS2 when available. Until then, ensure only trusted .yaml configuration files are loaded into nav2_amcl and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37861 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37861 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data