Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2024-37927

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in NooTheme Jobmonster noo-jobmonster allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Jobmonster: from n/a through <= 4.7.5.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Jobmonster WordPress theme from NooTheme contains an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability allowing privilege escalation. The vulnerability exists in versions through 4.7.5, where the application incorrectly assigns elevated privileges to certain users or user roles, enabling lower-privileged users to gain administrative or higher-level access they should not possess.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Jobmonster if available; otherwise, audit user role assignments and implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) checks throughout the application to ensure users can only access functions appropriate to their assigned role.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Jobmonster theme is in use
    In WordPress admin dashboard, go to Appearance > Themes and verify the active theme is Jobmonster by NooTheme, or check the theme's style.css header file for the theme name
    Affected if Jobmonster theme is installed and active
  2. Identify the installed version
    Check the theme's style.css file (typically in /wp-content/themes/jobmonster/) for the 'Version:' declaration in the header comments, or view theme details in WordPress admin under Appearance > Themes
    Affected if Version is 4.7.5 or lower (any version through 4.7.5)
  3. Audit user accounts for unexpected admin access
    In WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and review each user account's role. Compare assigned roles against expected permissions. Pay attention to any users with Administrator role who should not have that access
    Affected if Any user account has Administrator role that was not intentionally assigned that role by a site administrator
  4. Check for users with elevated capabilities
    Use a user role editor plugin or query the wp_usermeta table to examine capability assignments for non-admin users. Look for users with capabilities like 'manage_options', 'edit_users', or 'delete_users' assigned to non-administrator roles
    Affected if Non-administrator user accounts possess administrative-level capabilities

You are affected if Jobmonster theme version 4.7.5 or lower is active AND any user account has been granted administrative access or capabilities without intentional administrator assignment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Jobmonster if available; otherwise, audit user role assignments and implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) checks throughout the application to ensure users can only access functions appropriate to their assigned role.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37927 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37927 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data