CVE-2024-38285
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLogs storing credentials are insufficiently protected and can be decoded through the use of open source tools.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCredentials are being written to log files without adequate protection (likely weak encoding or lack of encryption), allowing attackers with log access to decode them using publicly available tools.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate application and system log filesSearch common log directories such as /var/log, C:\ProgramData\Logs, or application-specific log folders. Identify all log files generated by the application.Affected if Log files exist and are accessible to the system or application user
-
Search for credential patterns in logsUse grep, strings, or a text editor to search log files for keywords like password, secret, api_key, token, credential, auth, bearer, basic followed by = or : delimiters. Also look for base64-like patterns.Affected if Log files contain strings matching credential patterns
-
Analyze credential encoding strengthIf credentials are found, examine the encoding method. Check if they appear as plain text, simple base64, or weakly obfuscated strings. Attempt to decode any base64 strings to verify if they contain plaintext credentials.Affected if Credentials are stored in plain text, base64, or other weak encoding that can be easily decoded
-
Review logging configurationExamine application configuration files such as logging.config, log4j.xml, appsettings.json, or equivalent for settings related to credential logging, masking, or redaction. Check if DEBUG or TRACE level logging is enabled.Affected if Configuration enables logging of sensitive fields or uses weak masking that does not prevent credential extraction
-
Check log file access controlsVerify file permissions on log files. Ensure they are not world-readable or accessible to unauthorized users or processes who should not have log access.Affected if Log files have overly permissive access rights allowing unauthorized reading
The environment is affected if credentials or credential-like strings are found in log files using weak, reversible, or no encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper credential protection: either exclude credentials from logs entirely, or ensure credentials are encrypted with strong, non-reversible methods before storage.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-38285 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-38285 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data