IApplication · Ibm

CVE-2024-38330

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM System Management for i 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 could allow a local user to gain elevated privileges due to an unqualified library program call. A malicious actor could cause user-controlled code to run with administrator privilege. IBM X-Force ID: 295227.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM System Management for i versions 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability stemming from an unqualified library program call. A local authenticated user can exploit this to execute arbitrary code with administrator/elevated privileges by placing malicious code in a location where the unqualified call will resolve to it instead of the intended library.

MitigationApply IBM's security patch (refer to IBM X-Force ID 295227 or IBM's PTF/hipers fixes) to properly qualify library program calls, and restrict local system access to trusted users until the patch is deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
IApplication
Affected:= 7.2= 7.3= 7.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM i version
    Run command: DSPSFWRSC (Display Software Resources) and look for '5770SS1' entry, or use WRKIMGCLG to check the current IBM i release. Alternatively, run command: 'DSPOSinfo' to display operating system information.
    Affected if The installed version is 7.2, 7.3, or 7.4 and falls within the vulnerable release range.
  2. Confirm System Management for i component is installed
    Run command: GO LICPGM (Work with Licensed Programs) and check for the presence of System Management for i (5733SM) or verify via WRKPEP (Work with Program Entries) if System Management services are active.
    Affected if The System Management for i component is installed and running on the affected IBM i version.
  3. Identify unqualified program call usage
    Review job logs and system history for programs called without fully qualified library names (format: PROGRAM instead of LIBRARY/PROGRAM). Use command: DSPJOBLOG OUTPUT(*PRINT) on suspicious jobs, or inspect source code for calls lacking library qualifier.
    Affected if Unqualified program calls exist in the System Management for i environment that could resolve to user-controlled locations.
  4. Check for unauthorized library paths in library list
    Use command: DSPLIBL (Display Library List) to examine the current library list for user-created or temporary libraries positioned before system libraries. Review JOBL for job default library list.
    Affected if The library list includes user-writable libraries (like QTEMP, QGPL, or user libraries) positioned ahead of system libraries where malicious code could be placed.
  5. Audit user access to IBM i system
    Review user profiles with *ALLOBJ or special authorities using DSPUSRPRF (*ALL). Check for unnecessary local authenticated users with elevated privileges who could exploit this vulnerability.
    Affected if Multiple local authenticated users exist with access to place code in library list search paths.

The environment is affected if running IBM i version 7.2, 7.3, or 7.4 with System Management for i installed, where unqualified program calls can resolve to user-controlled library locations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM's security patch (refer to IBM X-Force ID 295227 or IBM's PTF/hipers fixes) to properly qualify library program calls, and restrict local system access to trusted users until the patch is deployed.

Fix this in I Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-38330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-38330 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data