CVE-2024-38501
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn unauthenticated remote attacker may use a HTML injection vulnerability with limited length to inject malicious HTML code and gain low-privileged access on the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an HTML injection vulnerability with limited input length to inject malicious HTML code, potentially enabling low-privileged access to the affected device. The vulnerability appears to be a stored injection (given the length constraint), likely in a web interface of a network device or application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.65< 3.4.9< 1.0.7< 7.09< 7.11< 7.11< 7.22< 1.08CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Pepperl Fuchs device modelAccess the device web interface or check device documentation/labels to identify the specific model (e.g., ICDM Rx/tcp Socketserver, Profinet, Modbus Router, Modbus Server, Modbus TCP, Ethernet/ip, or EIP/Modbus)Affected if The device model matches any of the affected product lines: ICDM Rx/tcp Socketserver, Profinet, Profinet/Modbus, Modbus Router, Modbus Server, Modbus TCP, Ethernet/ip, or EIP/Modbus
-
Check installed firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to System Information or Firmware/Software version page; alternatively, check via SNMP or device management console using 'show version' or equivalent commandAffected if The firmware version is below the affected threshold for your specific device model (ICDMrx/tcp < 11.65, Profinet < 3.4.9, Profinet/Modbus < 1.0.7, Modbus Router < 7.09, Modbus Server < 7.11, Modbus TCP < 7.11, Ethernet/ip < 7.22, EIP/Modbus < 1.08)
-
Verify web interface is enabledCheck device configuration settings for web server/HTTP interface status; look for options like 'Enable Web Server', 'HTTP Management', or 'Web UI' in the device web-based management consoleAffected if The web interface is enabled and accessible on the device (required for the HTML injection to be exploitable)
-
Confirm network accessibility of web interfaceAttempt to reach the device web interface via HTTP (typically ports 80/443) from a management workstation, or check firewall/network segmentation rules that may allow or block accessAffected if The device web interface is reachable from network segments where untrusted users could send requests (even without authentication)
You are affected if you have a Pepperl Fuchs device from the affected product lines with a web-enabled firmware version below the specified thresholds, and the web interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.0.71.083.4.9
Implement strict input validation and output encoding to neutralize HTML/JavaScript in user-supplied fields; apply Content Security Policy (CSP) headers as defense-in-depth.
Upgrade to Icdm Rx/tcp Socketserver firmware 11.65, Profinet 3.4.9, Profinet/modb Modbus 1.0.7, Modbus Router 7.09, Modbus Server 7.11, Modbus Tcp 7.11, Ethernet/ip 7.22, or Eip/modb Modbus 1.08 (as applicable to your device)
- Identify the specific firmware version currently running on the affected device(s) using the device's web interface or administrative console
- Navigate to the vendor's support or download page (cert.vde.com or official vendor site)
- Download the appropriate fixed firmware version for your device model: Icdm Rx/tcp Socketserver 11.65, Profinet 3.4.9, Profinet/modb Modbus 1.0.7, Modbus Router 7.09, Modbus Server 7.11, Modbus Tcp 7.11, Ethernet/ip 7.22, or Eip/modb Modbus 1.08
- Follow the vendor's standard firmware update procedure, typically via the device's web interface or a dedicated firmware upload utility
- After upgrading, verify the new firmware version is installed and confirm the vulnerability is remediated
- Consider implementing network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure until patches can be applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-38501 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-38501 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data