CVE-2024-38820
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe fix for CVE-2022-22968 made disallowedFields patterns in DataBinder case insensitive. However, String.toLowerCase() has some Locale dependent exceptions that could potentially result in fields not protected as expected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe fix for CVE-2022-22968 made DataBinder's disallowedFields patterns case-insensitive using String.toLowerCase(). However, toLowerCase() is Locale-dependent and has known issues (particularly with Turkish locale where 'I' and 'İ' convert unexpectedly) that can allow attackers to bypass field protection by using certain case variations that aren't properly converted to lowercase.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.3.0, < 5.3.41>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.25>= 6.1.0, < 6.1.14CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Spring Framework versionCheck your project's dependencies (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or JAR manifest files) for spring-core or spring-framework-bom version. Also check the spring-core-X.jar file name in your deployment.Affected if The version is 5.3.0 through 5.3.40, 6.0.0 through 6.0.24, or 6.1.0 through 6.1.13.
-
Verify DataBinder disallowedFields usageSearch your codebase for usage of DataBinder, BindException, or WebDataBinder, especially calls to setDisallowedFields() or configurations that define protected fields.Affected if Your application explicitly configures disallowed fields for binding protection.
-
Inspect the case conversion implementationDecompile or inspect the Spring Framework JAR file (spring-beans or spring-core). Look for the bind method in DataBinder or DirectFieldAccessor. Check if the code uses toLowerCase() without Locale.ROOT versus toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT).Affected if The code contains plain toLowerCase() calls in field matching logic rather than toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT) or toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT).
-
Check runtime locale configurationInspect the JVM system locale settings via System.getProperty("user.language") or check application locale configuration. In Turkish locale (tr_TR), the vulnerability is most pronounced.Affected if The application or JVM runs with Turkish (tr) or similar locale where I/i conversion behaves unexpectedly.
Your environment is affected if you run an affected Spring Framework version, use DataBinder's disallowedFields feature, have vulnerable toLowerCase() code (not Locale.ROOT), and run in a problematic locale like Turkish.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.3.416.0.256.1.14
Apply the latest Spring Framework patch that uses Locale-independent case conversion (toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT) or equivalent) to ensure consistent field matching across all locales.
Spring Framework 5.3.41, 6.0.25, or 6.1.14 (depending on major version line in use)
- 1. Identify the current Spring Framework version in use by checking build configuration files (pom.xml, build.gradle, or dependency management)
- 2. Determine which major version line (5.3.x, 6.0.x, or 6.1.x) is in use
- 3. Upgrade Spring Framework to the appropriate fixed version: 5.3.41 for 5.3.x line, 6.0.25 for 6.0.x line, or 6.1.14 for 6.1.x line
- 4. Update the version in the build configuration file
- 5. Rebuild and test the application to ensure functionality remains intact
- 6. Verify the upgrade resolves the vulnerability by reviewing the DataBinder disallowedFields behavior
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-38820 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-38820 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data