CVE-2024-38878
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP3 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP4 (All versions). Affected devices allow authenticated users to export diagnostics data. The corresponding API endpoint is susceptible to path traversal and could allow an authenticated attacker to download arbitrary files from the file system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in the diagnostics data export API endpoint of Omnivise T3000 Application Server (R9.2, R8.2 SP3, R8.2 SP4) allows authenticated attackers to manipulate file paths and download arbitrary files from the server's file system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= r9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Omnivise T3000 Application ServerLocate the application version file or check the product about/information panel within the T3000 management console. On Windows systems, this may also be found in the installation directory metadata or Windows Programs and Features.Affected if The installed version matches r9.2 (or falls within the R9.2, R8.2 SP3, R8.2 SP4 range if additional version data is available)
-
Confirm the diagnostics data export API endpoint exists and is enabledCheck the T3000 server configuration files or web service settings for the diagnostics export functionality. Look for endpoints related to 'diagnostics', 'export', or 'data' in the API configuration.Affected if The diagnostics export API endpoint is present and enabled in the configuration
-
Verify the API endpoint accepts path traversal sequencesIf you have access to the diagnostics export endpoint (typically under /api/diagnostics/export or similar path), attempt a controlled request with a path traversal sequence like ../ to see if the server processes it. In a production environment, review server access logs for such patterns.Affected if The endpoint accepts and processes path traversal characters without proper sanitization
-
Check network accessibility of the diagnostics APIReview firewall rules, network segmentation, and access control lists to determine if the T3000 Application Server and its API endpoints are exposed to the network or only accessible from trusted management stations.Affected if The diagnostics export API is accessible from untrusted network segments or the internet
-
Review authentication configuration for the endpointExamine the authentication and authorization settings for the diagnostics export API in the T3000 security configuration. Verify whether the endpoint properly enforces authentication or has any bypass conditions.Affected if The endpoint allows unauthenticated access or has weak authentication controls that could be exploited
The environment is affected if running a vulnerable version (r9.2 or the R8.2 SP3/SP4 range) with the diagnostics export API endpoint enabled and accessible, regardless of whether authentication is required for initial access since an authenticated attacker could exploit the path traversal flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation on the diagnostics export API endpoint to reject path traversal sequences (../ etc.), apply vendor-provided security patches when released, and restrict diagnostic export functionality to minimum necessary users.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-38878 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-38878 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data