CVE-2024-38990
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTada5hi sp-common v0.5.4 was discovered to contain a prototype pollution via the function mergeDeep. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting arbitrary properties.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Tada5hi sp-common library v0.5.4 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in the mergeDeep function. Attackers can inject arbitrary properties into JavaScript objects by exploiting this function, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service by manipulating the object prototype chain.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the sp-common package in your project dependenciesSearch for 'sp-common' in your package.json file or check node_modules/@tada5hi/sp-common if using scoped packagesAffected if The package is present in your project
-
Identify the installed version of sp-commonRun 'npm list @tada5hi/sp-common' or check the version field in package.json under sp-common dependenciesAffected if The version listed is exactly 0.5.4
-
Find usage of the mergeDeep function in your codebaseSearch your source code for imports or requires of mergeDeep from sp-common, for example: 'import { mergeDeep } from @tada5hi/sp-common' or similar patternsAffected if The mergeDeep function is imported and used in your code
-
Inspect inputs passed to mergeDeep callsReview all function calls passing data to mergeDeep and examine whether untrusted user input reaches these calls, especially checking for property names containing __proto__, constructor, or prototypeAffected if User-controlled or unsanitized data is passed to mergeDeep without filtering those special property names
You are affected if sp-common version 0.5.4 is installed AND the mergeDeep function is being used with untrusted or unsanitized input that could contain __proto__, constructor, or prototype property names.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of sp-common when available. As an interim measure, validate and sanitize all inputs before passing them to mergeDeep, specifically blocking __proto__, constructor, and prototype property names.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-38990 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-38990 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data