CVE-2024-39361
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 9.8.0, 9.7.x <= 9.7.4, 9.6.x <= 9.6.2 and 9.5.x <= 9.5.5 fail to prevent users from specifying a RemoteId for their posts which allows an attacker to specify both a remoteId and the post ID, resulting in creating a post with a user-defined post ID. This can cause some broken functionality in the channel or thread with user-defined posts
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost versions 9.5.x through 9.8.0 contain an IDOR vulnerability where the application does not validate or restrict user-specified RemoteId and post ID parameters during post creation. This allows authenticated users to create posts with arbitrary identifiers, potentially causing broken functionality in channels or threads.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.5.0, < 9.5.6>= 9.6.0, < 9.6.3>= 9.7.0, < 9.7.4>= 9.8.0, < 9.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Mattermost versionCheck the Mattermost server version by logging into the System Console and navigating to 'About' > 'Mattermost', or by running: curl -H 'Authorization: Bearer <admin_token>' https://<mattermost_url>/api/v4/system/aboutAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 9.5.0 to 9.5.5, 9.6.0 to 9.6.2, 9.7.0 to 9.7.3, or 9.8.0
-
Verify the vulnerability exists in the detected versionCompare the installed version number to the affected ranges: >= 9.5.0 and < 9.5.6, OR >= 9.6.0 and < 9.6.3, OR >= 9.7.0 and < 9.7.4, OR >= 9.8.0 and < 9.8.1Affected if The version matches any of the affected ranges listed above
-
Confirm authenticated user access to post creation APIVerify that regular authenticated users have access to the posts API endpoint. In Mattermost, authenticated users can create posts via POST /api/v4/posts. Confirm this endpoint is accessible to non-admin users in your environment.Affected if Authenticated users can access the post creation endpoint, which is the default configuration in Mattermost
You are affected if your Mattermost server version is 9.5.0-9.5.5, 9.6.0-9.6.2, 9.7.0-9.7.3, or 9.8.0, and authenticated users can create posts (standard configuration).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.69.6.39.7.4
Apply vendor patches by upgrading to Mattermost versions 9.8.1, 9.7.5, 9.6.3, or 9.5.6 or later which enforce proper validation of RemoteId and post ID parameters.
Upgrade to Mattermost 9.5.6, 9.6.3, 9.7.4, or 9.8.1 (depending on your current branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Mattermost version by checking the system settings or running 'mattermost version'
- 2. Determine which affected version branch your installation falls into (9.5.x, 9.6.x, 9.7.x, or 9.8.x)
- 3. For Mattermost 9.5.x: Upgrade to version 9.5.6 or later
- 4. For Mattermost 9.6.x: Upgrade to version 9.6.3 or later
- 5. For Mattermost 9.7.x: Upgrade to version 9.7.4 or later
- 6. For Mattermost 9.8.0: Upgrade to version 9.8.1 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by testing post creation functionality to confirm proper RemoteId handling
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39361 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39361 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data