Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2024-39372

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Uncontrolled search path for the Intel(R) XTU software for Windows before version 7.14.2.14 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Intel XTU before version 7.14.2.14 contains an uncontrolled search path vulnerability (DLL hijacking) where an authenticated local user can place malicious DLL files in directories searched by the application, potentially achieving privilege escalation when the software loads those DLLs.

MitigationUpgrade Intel XTU to version 7.14.2.14 or later to resolve the uncontrolled search path vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Intel XTU installation directory
    Search for Intel XTU executable files - typical locations include Program Files\Intel\Intel(R) Extreme Tuning Utility\ or Program Files (x86)\Intel\Intel(R) Extreme Tuning Utility\. Use file explorer search or PowerShell: Get-ChildItem -Path 'C:\Program Files','C:\Program Files (x86)' -Recurse -Filter '*.exe' | Where-Object {$_.Name -like '*XTU*' -or $_.Name -like '*Extreme Tuning*'}
    Affected if Intel XTU executable is found in any directory on the system
  2. Identify Intel XTU executable version
    Right-click the located XTU executable (commonly XTU3I.exe or similar), select Properties, then navigate to the Details tab to view the File Version or Product Version field. Alternatively, use PowerShell: (Get-Item 'C:\path\to\XTU3I.exe').VersionInfo
    Affected if A version number is displayed in the executable properties
  3. Compare installed version against vulnerable range
    Compare the found version number to 7.14.2.14. The vulnerability affects all versions BEFORE 7.14.2.14. Note that version format may appear as 7.14.2.14 or similar patterns.
    Affected if Installed version is lower than 7.14.2.14 (for example 7.14.0.20, 7.13.x.x, or any version starting with 7.12, 7.11, etc.)
  4. Verify DLL search path vulnerability conditions
    DLL hijacking occurs when the application loads DLLs from directories that are writable by lower-privileged users. Check permissions on the Intel XTU installation directory and subdirectories: Right-click folder > Properties > Security tab. Also check if the application loads DLLs from the current working directory or user-writable paths.
    Affected if The Intel XTU installation directory or its DLL load paths are writable by standard users, allowing placement of malicious DLL files

A system is affected if Intel XTU version is installed and is lower than 7.14.2.14, and the application directory or DLL search paths allow writable access to lower-privileged users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Intel XTU to version 7.14.2.14 or later to resolve the uncontrolled search path vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

7.14.2.14

  1. Navigate to the official Intel website and download Intel(R) XTU version 7.14.2.14 or later
  2. Locate the downloaded installer file
  3. Run the installer with administrator privileges
  4. Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
  5. Restart the system if prompted
  6. Verify the installed version by opening Intel XTU and checking the version number matches 7.14.2.14 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
4.0 hours of engineering $750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39372 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data