CVE-2024-39511
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the 802.1X Authentication (dot1x) Daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows a local, low-privileged attacker with access to the CLI to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On running a specific operational dot1x command, the dot1x daemon crashes. An attacker can cause a sustained DoS condition by running this command repeatedly. When the crash occurs, the authentication status of any 802.1x clients is cleared, and any authorized dot1x port becomes unauthorized. The client cannot re-authenticate until the dot1x daemon restarts. This issue affects Junos OS: * All versions before 20.4R3-S10; * 21.2 versions before 21.2R3-S7; * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S6; * 22.1 versions before 22.1R3-S5; * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S3; * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S2; * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S1; * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA local, low-privileged attacker with CLI access can trigger a denial of service in the Junos OS dot1x daemon by executing a specific operational command. The command causes the daemon to crash, which clears 802.1X client authentication states and renders authorized ports unauthorized until the daemon restarts, enabling sustained DoS through repeated command execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Junos OS versionExecute 'show version' or 'show version detail' from the CLI and locate the Junos OS version string (e.g., 22.3R3).Affected if The installed version matches any of these: versions below 20.4, 20.4, 21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2.
-
Verify dot1x daemon is runningExecute 'show dot1x interface' or 'show dot1x summary' from the CLI to check if 802.1X authentication is configured and the dot1x daemon is active.Affected if The dot1x daemon is running and 802.1X authentication is enabled on any interface.
-
Confirm CLI access exists for low-privileged usersReview user accounts and their privilege levels using 'show system login' and check the assigned class for each user. Verify if users with 'operator' or 'read-only' class exist.Affected if Any low-privileged user account (operator, read-only, or similar restricted class) has CLI access to the device.
-
Identify exposed dot1x operational commandsExecute 'request dot1x' commands available to your privilege level and observe if any cause unexpected daemon behavior or errors. Compare available commands against those documented in Juniper's CLI guide for dot1x.Affected if A specific operational command executable by a low-privileged user triggers dot1x daemon instability or crash.
You are affected if your Junos version matches the affected list, dot1x authentication is enabled, and a low-privileged user can execute the triggering command via CLI.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Apply the appropriate Junos OS software update for your version branch as specified in the Juniper advisory, and schedule a maintenance window to minimize disruption to 802.1X authenticated clients.
Upgrade to the appropriate fixed release for your branch: 20.4R3-S10, 21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3-S1, or 23.2R2 (or later)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version and branch running on the device using `show version`
- 2. Determine which branch (20.4, 21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2) the device is on
- 3. For devices on the 20.4 branch, upgrade to 20.4R3-S10 or later
- 4. For devices on the 21.2 branch, upgrade to 21.2R3-S7 or later
- 5. For devices on the 21.4 branch, upgrade to 21.4R3-S6 or later
- 6. For devices on the 22.1 branch, upgrade to 22.1R3-S5 or later
- 7. For devices on the 22.2 branch, upgrade to 22.2R3-S3 or later
- 8. For devices on the 22.3 branch, upgrade to 22.3R3-S2 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39511 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39511 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data