CVE-2024-39518
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the telemetry sensor process (sensord) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX240, MX480, MX960 platforms using MPC10E causes a steady increase in memory utilization, ultimately leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). When the device is subscribed to a specific subscription on Junos Telemetry Interface, a slow memory leak occurs and eventually all resources are consumed and the device becomes unresponsive. A manual reboot of the Line Card will be required to restore the device to its normal functioning. This issue is only seen when telemetry subscription is active. The Heap memory utilization can be monitored using the following command: > show system processes extensive The following command can be used to monitor the memory utilization of the specific sensor > show system info | match sensord PID NAME MEMORY PEAK MEMORY %CPU THREAD-COUNT CORE-AFFINITY UPTIME 1986 sensord 877.57MB 877.57MB 2 4 0,2-15 7-21:41:32 This issue affects Junos OS: * from 21.2R3-S5 before 21.2R3-S7, * from 21.4R3-S4 before 21.4R3-S6, * from 22.2R3 before 22.2R3-S4, * from 22.3R2 before 22.3R3-S2, * from 22.4R1 before 22.4R3, * from 23.2R1 before 23.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in Junos OS sensord (telemetry sensor process) on MX240/MX480/MX960 platforms with MPC10E causes a slow memory leak when a specific telemetry subscription is active, eventually consuming all resources and requiring manual line card reboot for recovery.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify platform is MX240, MX480, or MX960Run 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system hardware' to confirm the router modelAffected if The platform is not one of these three models - the vulnerability does not apply
-
Confirm MPC10E line cards are presentRun 'show chassis hardware' and look for MPC10E line cards in the inventoryAffected if No MPC10E line cards are installed - the vulnerability cannot be triggered
-
Check Junos OS version against affected releasesRun 'show version' and compare the installed version to 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2Affected if The version does not match one of the listed affected versions - the system is not vulnerable to this CVE
-
Monitor sensord process memory usageRun 'show system processes extensive | match sensord' repeatedly over time to observe memory consumption growthAffected if The sensord process shows continuous memory growth that does not stabilize, indicating the heap-based buffer overflow leak is occurring
-
Review active telemetry subscriptionsRun 'show system subscriber-management telemetry' or 'show services analytics management' to list active telemetry subscriptionsAffected if A specific telemetry subscription is active that triggers the flaw - the vulnerability requires this subscription to be present to manifest the memory leak
You are affected if your MX240/MX480/MX960 has MPC10E line cards, runs one of the affected Junos versions (21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2), and has a telemetry subscription that triggers the sensord memory leak observable via increasing memory usage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to the fixed versions (21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S6, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, 23.2R2 or later). Monitor sensord memory usage with 'show system processes extensive' and 'show system info | match sensord' as a detection method until patching is possible.
Upgrade to one of: 21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S6, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, or 23.2R2 (whichever matches your release train)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version using 'show version' command
- 2. Verify the device is an MX240, MX480, or MX960 with MPC10E line cards using 'show chassis hardware'
- 3. Confirm the telemetry subscription is active that triggers the issue using 'show services analytics interface'
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 5. Back up the current configuration using 'request system configuration backup'
- 6. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS version for your platform: 21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S6, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, or 23.2R2
- 7. Upload the Junos software image to the device using 'request system software add'
- 8. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39518 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39518 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data