CVE-2024-39519
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX7000 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). On all ACX 7000 Series platforms running Junos OS Evolved, and configured with IRBs, if a Customer Edge device (CE) device is dual homed to two Provider Edge devices (PE) a traffic loop will occur when the CE sends multicast packets. This issue can be triggered by IPv4 and IPv6 traffic. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: All versions from 22.2R1-EVO and later versions before 22.4R2-EVO, This issue does not affect Junos OS Evolved versions before 22.1R1-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper check for unusual conditions in the Packet Forwarding Engine of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX7000 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a traffic loop and DoS when a dual-homed Customer Edge device sends multicast packets in an IRB-configured network environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 22.2, < 22.4= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or check the device model to confirm it is an ACX7000 Series deviceAffected if Device is not an ACX7000 Series (vulnerability only affects ACX7000)
-
Check Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version' to identify the installed Junos OS Evolved versionAffected if Version is 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or any version >= 22.2 and < 22.4R2-EVO (including 22.4 exactly)
-
Verify IRB configuration existsRun 'show configuration interfaces irb' or 'show configuration routing-instances' to check if IRB interfaces are configuredAffected if IRB interfaces are configured in the network environment
-
Confirm multicast routing is enabledRun 'show configuration protocols pim' or 'show configuration routing-options multicast' to check if multicast protocols (PIM) or multicast routing are enabledAffected if Multicast routing or PIM is enabled on the device
-
Check for dual-homed CE topologyReview network topology and run 'show configuration protocols bgp' or 'show lacp' to identify if there is a dual-homed Customer Edge device connected to the ACX7000Affected if A dual-homed CE device exists sending multicast traffic in the IRB network
User is affected if running Junos OS Evolved on ACX7000 Series versions 22.2 through 22.4 with IRB configured, multicast routing enabled, and a dual-homed CE device in the network topology.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.4
Upgrade Junos OS Evolved on ACX7000 Series to version 22.4R2-EVO or later. As an interim measure, consider disabling multicast routing or implementing loop prevention mechanisms at the CE-PE interface level.
22.4R2-EVO or later
- Upgrade Junos OS Evolved on ACX7000 Series devices to version 22.4R2-EVO or later
- After upgrade, verify the IRB configuration and dual-homing setup is functioning correctly
- Monitor for any traffic loop issues with multicast IPv4/IPv6 traffic
- Review release notes for any additional migration or compatibility notes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39519 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39519 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data