CVE-2024-39523
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Neutralization of Special Elements vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved commands allows a local, authenticated attacker with low privileges to escalate their privileges to 'root' leading to a full compromise of the system. The Junos OS Evolved CLI doesn't properly handle command options in some cases, allowing users which execute specific CLI commands with a crafted set of parameters to escalate their privileges to root on shell level. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 20.4R3-S7-EVO, * 21.2-EVO versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO, * 21.4-EVO versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO, * 22.1-EVO versions before 22.1R3-S6-EVO, * 22.2-EVO versions before 22.2R3-EVO, * 22.3-EVO versions before 22.3R2-EVO, * 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Junos OS Evolved CLI where improper handling of command options allows authenticated low-privilege users to gain root shell access. The issue stems from insufficient neutralization of special elements in CLI command parameters, enabling full system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS Evolved versionExecute 'show version' or 'show version detail' via CLI to retrieve the installed Junos OS Evolved version numberAffected if Version matches any of: < 20.4, 20.4, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4 (before patched releases)
-
Confirm product is Junos OS EvolvedVerify the output from 'show version' indicates 'Junos OS Evolved' rather than standard Junos OSAffected if Product is Junos OS Evolved (not classic Junos OS)
-
Check for low-privilege user accountsReview configured user accounts with 'show system users' or check authentication configuration for non-root accounts with CLI login accessAffected if Low-privilege authenticated users have CLI shell access
-
Verify CLI operational mode accessAttempt to access CLI operational mode as a low-privilege test user or review user permission sets with 'show configuration system login'Affected if Authenticated users can execute CLI commands in operational mode
Environment is affected if running a vulnerable Junos OS Evolved version (20.4, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or any version before 20.4) AND low-privilege users have CLI access, allowing potential privilege escalation to root shell via malicious command options.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Apply the vendor-supplied Junos OS Evolved patches for the specific version branch (20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.1R3-S6-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO, or 22.4R2-EVO and later) after appropriate testing in a non-production environment.
20.4R3-S7-EVO / 21.2R3-S8-EVO / 21.4R3-S7-EVO / 22.1R3-S6-EVO / 22.2R3-EVO / 22.3R2-EVO / 22.4R2-EVO (depending on branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version by running 'show version' in CLI
- 2. Based on current version, determine the minimum fixed release needed: for 20.4x go to 20.4R3-S7-EVO or later, for 21.2x go to 21.2R3-S8-EVO or later, for 21.4x go to 21.4R3-S7-EVO or later, for 22.1x go to 22.1R3-S6-EVO or later, for 22.2x go to 22.2R3-EVO or later, for 22.3x go to 22.3R2-EVO or later, for 22.4x go to 22.4R2-EVO or later
- 3. Download the appropriate Junos OS Evolved software package from the Juniper Networks support portal (supportportal.juniper.net)
- 4. Upload the software package to the device using 'request system software add <package> syncing' or similar command
- 5. Reboot the device after upgrade completes using 'request system reboot'
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version is installed by running 'show version' and confirm the fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39523 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39523 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data