CVE-2024-39524
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Neutralization of Special Elements vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved commands allows a local, authenticated attacker with low privileges to escalate their privileges to 'root' leading to a full compromise of the system. The Junos OS Evolved CLI doesn't properly handle command options in some cases, allowing users which execute specific CLI commands with a crafted set of parameters to escalate their privileges to root on shell level. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: All versions before 20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.2-EVO versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4-EVO versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2-EVO versions before 22.2R3-EVO, 22.3-EVO versions before 22.3R2-EVO, 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Junos OS Evolved CLI where improper handling of command options allows authenticated low-privilege users to gain root shell access. The issue stems from insufficient input validation on CLI command parameters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version' or 'version' command in the CLI to obtain the installed Junos OS Evolved version numberAffected if The displayed version matches one of the affected versions: < 20.4, 20.4, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4 (or falls between these such as 21.1, 21.3, 22.1, 22.5, 23.x, etc., which are also vulnerable)
-
Identify authenticated CLI user accountsReview user accounts configured in the system using 'show configuration system login' to list all users with CLI access permissionsAffected if There are non-root users configured with CLI login access (especially users with operator, read-only, or super-user privileges)
-
Verify the vulnerable CLI command interface is exposedAttempt to access the CLI as a low-privilege user and examine whether the CLI command parser processes user-supplied options without proper validationAffected if Low-privilege authenticated users can execute CLI commands and pass arbitrary parameters to them
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Junos OS Evolved version (20.4, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or any version between these that is not patched) and has authenticated low-privilege users with CLI access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Upgrade Junos OS Evolved to the specified fixed versions (20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO, or 22.4R2-EVO) or later per the version matrix. Restrict CLI access to trusted personnel until patches are applied.
20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO, or 22.4R2-EVO (depending on your release train)
- Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version using 'show version' command
- Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version (20.4.x → 20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.2.x → 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4.x → 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2.x → 22.2R3-EVO, 22.3.x → 22.3R2-EVO, 22.4.x → 22.4R2-EVO)
- Download the appropriate fixed EVO software package from Juniper Networks support portal
- Upload the software to the device using 'request system software add' or similar method
- Reboot the device to apply the upgrade using 'request system reboot'
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the version matches the fixed release
- Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by verifying the installed version is at or above the fixed releases listed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39524 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39524 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data