CVE-2024-39534
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Incorrect Comparison vulnerability in the local address verification API of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker to create sessions or send traffic to the device using the network and broadcast address of the subnet assigned to an interface. This is unintended and unexpected behavior and can allow an attacker to bypass certain compensating controls, such as stateless firewall filters. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.4R3-S8-EVO, * 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S4-EVO, * 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-S4-EVO, * 22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-S3-EVO, * 23.2-EVO before 23.2R2-S1-EVO, * 23.4-EVO before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability is an incorrect comparison flaw in Junos OS Evolved's local address verification API. This allows unauthenticated network-adjacent attackers to send traffic or create sessions using the network and broadcast addresses of a subnet assigned to an interface, which should normally be rejected. This bypasses compensating controls like stateless firewall filters that rely on proper address validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.4= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the Junos OS Evolved versionRun the command 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the device to obtain the installed software versionAffected if The installed version is < 21.4, = 21.4, = 22.2, = 22.3, = 22.4, = 23.2, or = 23.4
-
Identify interfaces with assigned subnetsRun 'show configuration interfaces' and review interface unit configurations for addresses assigned in the format 'x.x.x.x/nn'Affected if Any interface has a subnet assigned; the vulnerability affects traffic sent to network and broadcast addresses of these subnets
-
Verify local address verification behaviorAttempt to ping or send traffic to the network address and broadcast address of a configured subnet from a network-adjacent hostAffected if Traffic to network or broadcast addresses is accepted when it should be rejected (this indicates the flaw is present)
-
Review firewall filter configurationsRun 'show configuration firewall' and inspect any stateless filters applied to interfacesAffected if Firewall filters exist as compensating controls, but the vulnerability may still allow traffic that should be blocked based on improper address validation
The device is affected if it runs Junos OS Evolved version 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4 (or any version below 21.4) and has network interfaces with assigned subnets, because the local address verification flaw allows network and broadcast addresses to be used when they should be rejected.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.4
Apply the appropriate Junos OS Evolved patch per the version matrix (21.4R3-S8-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S4-EVO, 22.4R3-S3-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, 23.4R1-S2-EVO or later). Review existing firewall filter configurations as a compensating control until patching is complete.
21.4R3-S8-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S4-EVO, 22.4R3-S3-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, or 23.4R1-S2-EVO (choose the appropriate branch for your current version)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version' command
- 2. Determine the appropriate fixed release based on the current version branch (21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4)
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed software image from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 4. Transfer the software image to the device using SCP or USB
- 5. Install the software upgrade using the 'request system software add <image-name>' command
- 6. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot' command to apply the new software
- 7. After reboot, verify the fix is applied by checking the version and confirming the patch level (e.g., 21.4R3-S8-EVO or higher)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39534 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39534 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data