CVE-2024-39537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX 7000 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a limited information disclosure and availability impact to the device. Due to a wrong initialization, specific processes which should only be able to communicate internally within the device can be reached over the network via open ports. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved on ACX 7000 Series: * All versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO, * 22.2-EVO versions before 22.2R3-S4-EVO, * 22.3-EVO versions before 22.3R3-S3-EVO, * 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-S2-EVO, * 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-EVO, * 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R1-S1-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX 7000 Series involves improper initialization that exposes internal processes, which should only communicate locally within the device, to the network via open ports. An unauthenticated, network-based attacker can reach these processes, leading to limited information disclosure and availability impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.4= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is ACX 7000 SeriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to identify the hardware modelAffected if Device is not an ACX 7000 Series - this vulnerability only affects this specific platform
-
Check installed Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version' to display the installed Junos OS Evolved version numberAffected if Version is 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4, or any version earlier than 21.4
-
Verify open ports on the deviceRun 'show system connections' or 'netstat -an' to list listening ports and compare against expected baseline configurationAffected if Unexpected ports are listening that correspond to internal processes exposed to the network
Device is affected if it is an ACX 7000 Series running Junos OS Evolved version 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or any version prior to 21.4, with internal processes accessible via network ports
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.4
Upgrade Junos OS Evolved on ACX 7000 Series to one of the patched versions specified in the advisory (21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO, 23.4R1-S1-EVO, or 23.4R2-EVO depending on the release train).
Upgrade to one of: 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO, 23.4R1-S1-EVO, or 23.4R2-EVO (whichever is the next stable release for your branch)
- Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version on the ACX 7000 Series device using 'show version'
- Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version: if running a version before 21.4R3-S7-EVO, upgrade to 21.4R3-S7-EVO or later; if running 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO, upgrade to 22.2R3-S4-EVO or later; if running 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO, upgrade to 22.3R3-S3-EVO or later
- Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS Evolved image from the Juniper Networks support portal
- Upload the new image to the device using 'request system software add' with the appropriate package path
- Reboot the device to apply the new software version using 'request system reboot'
- After reboot, verify the fix is applied by confirming the new version is running with 'show version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data