CVE-2024-39539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). In a subscriber management scenario continuous subscriber logins will trigger a memory leak and eventually lead to an FPC crash and restart. This issue affects Junos OS on MX Series: * All version before 21.2R3-S6, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S6, * 22.1 versions before 22.1R3-S5, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S3, * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S2, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory leak vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause denial-of-service. In subscriber management scenarios, continuous subscriber logins consume memory without proper release, eventually causing the FPC (Flexible PIC Concentrator) to crash and restart.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS version on MX SeriesRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' command on the device to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: < 21.2, 21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2
-
Confirm device is an MX Series platformRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' to verify the device model is from the MX Series familyAffected if The device is an MX Series router (e.g., MX240, MX480, MX960, etc.)
-
Verify subscriber management is enabledRun 'show subscribers summary' or 'show system subscribers interface' to check if there are active subscriber management sessionsAffected if Subscriber management is configured and there are active subscribers - this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Check for recent FPC crash eventsRun 'show log messages' and search for FPC-related crash entries using 'show log messages | match "FPC.*crash"' or 'show log messages | match "FPC.*restart"'Affected if Recent FPC crash or restart events are present in the system logs, especially if correlated with high subscriber activity
The environment is affected if the device is an MX Series running a vulnerable Junos version (listed in step 1) with subscriber management enabled, and there is evidence of FPC memory issues or crashes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Upgrade Junos OS on MX Series to a patched version as specified in the Juniper advisory (21.2R3-S6, 21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, or 23.2R2 and later). Plan upgrade during maintenance window and test in lab environment first.
Upgrade to Junos OS 21.2R3-S6 or later (21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, or 23.2R2 depending on your release train)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the MX Series device using 'show version' command
- 2. Identify if the device is in a subscriber management scenario (PPPoE, DHCP, etc.) as this is the trigger condition
- 3. If running an affected version (<21.2R3-S6, 21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, or 23.2R2), plan for upgrade during maintenance window
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS version for your hardware platform from supportportal.juniper.net
- 5. Upload the Junos OS image to the device using 'request system software add' command
- 6. Reboot the device to apply the new Junos OS version using 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version'
- 8. Monitor FPC (Flexible PIC Concentrator) stability and memory usage with 'show chassis fpc' and 'show system memory'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data