CVE-2024-39544
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in the command line interface (CLI) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows a low privileged local attacker to view NETCONF traceoptions files, representing an exposure of sensitive information. On all Junos OS Evolved platforms, when NETCONF traceoptions are configured, NETCONF traceoptions files get created with an incorrect group permission, which allows a low-privileged user can access sensitive information compromising the confidentiality of the system. Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 20.4R3-S9-EVO, * 21.2-EVO before 21.2R3-S7-EVO, * 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S5-EVO, * 22.1-EVO before 22.1R3-S5-EVO, * 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S3-EVO, * 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-EVO, 22.3R3-S2-EVO, * 22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-EVO, * 23.2-EVO before 23.2R1-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Junos OS Evolved, when NETCONF traceoptions are configured, the resulting log files are created with overly permissive group permissions that allow low-privileged local users to read them. This exposes sensitive information such as NETCONF session details, configuration data, and potential credentials that may have been logged.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is running Junos OS EvolvedRun 'show version' or 'show system information' and verify the OS name includes 'Junos OS Evolved' rather than 'Junos OS'Affected if The device is running regular Junos OS (not Evolved) - this CVE only affects Junos OS Evolved
-
Check installed Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version' and note the exact version string (for example: 22.3R3, 23.2R1, etc.)Affected if Version matches one of the affected versions: < 20.4, 20.4, 21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2 (including any sub-versions like R1, R2, R3, S1, S2, etc. within these releases)
-
Verify NETCONF traceoptions is configuredRun 'show configuration | display set | match traceoptions' or check the configuration at 'set system services netconf traceoptions'Affected if NETCONF traceoptions configuration exists (the vulnerability only applies when NETCONF traceoptions are enabled)
-
Inspect NETCONF traceoptions log file permissionsLocate the traceoptions log file (typically under /var/log/ or as configured under 'set system services netconf traceoptions file') and run 'ls -la' on the log file to check its permissionsAffected if Log file shows group-readable permissions (such as '-rw-rw-r--' or '-rw-r----') and you are running an affected version with NETCONF traceoptions configured
You are affected if the device runs Junos OS Evolved with an affected version number AND has NETCONF traceoptions configured, resulting in log files that are group-readable by low-privileged local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Upgrade Junos OS Evolved to one of the fixed versions (20.4R3-S9-EVO, 21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-EVO/22.3R3-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, 23.2R1-S2-EVO, or 23.2R2-EVO) per the vendor advisory.
20.4R3-S9-EVO, 21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-EVO or 22.3R3-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, 23.2R1-S2-EVO or 23.2R2-EVO depending on current branch
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version using 'show version' command
- 2. Review NETCONF traceoptions configuration using 'show configuration | display set | grep traceoptions'
- 3. Plan an upgrade to a fixed version based on your current branch: For 20.4 branch, upgrade to 20.4R3-S9-EVO or later; For 21.2 branch, upgrade to 21.2R3-S7-EVO or later; For 21.4 branch, upgrade to 21.4R3-S5-EVO or later; For 22.1 branch, upgrade to 22.1R3-S5-EVO or later; For 22.2 branch, upgrade to 22.2R3-S3-EVO or later; For 22.3 branch, upgrade to 22.3R3-EVO or 22.3R3-S2-EVO or later; For 22
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 5. Before upgrade, backup the current configuration using 'request system configuration rescue save'
- 6. Perform the upgrade following Juniper upgrade procedures (use 'request system software add' or 'request system reboot')
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by checking NETCONF traceoptions file permissions - files should no longer be readable by low-privileged users (ls -la on /var/log/ or the configured traceoptions directory)
- 8. Confirm the new version is running using 'show version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,280.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39544 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39544 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data