CVE-2024-39545
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the the IKE daemon (iked) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3 and NFX350 allows allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker sending specific mismatching parameters as part of the IPsec negotiation to trigger an iked crash leading to Denial of Service (DoS). This issue is applicable to all platforms that run iked. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3 and NFX350: * All versions before 21.2R3-S8, * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S7, * from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S2, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S1, * from 22.3 before 22.3R2-S1, 22.3R3, * from 22.4 before 22.4R1-S2, 22.4R2, 22.4R3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the IKE daemon (iked) of Juniper Junos OS on SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3, and NFX350 allows an unauthenticated network attacker to crash the iked process by sending IPsec negotiation requests with specific mismatching parameters. The daemon fails to properly handle these unusual conditions, resulting in a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' on the device and locate the Junos OS version number in the outputAffected if The version is 21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4, or any version earlier than 21.2 (for example 20.4, 20.3, etc.)
-
Confirm iked process is runningRun 'show system processes process-name iked' or check process status via 'request system process daemon iked status'Affected if The iked daemon is actively running on the device
-
Verify IKE/IPsec is configuredRun 'show configuration security ike' to display IKE configuration, or 'show security ike security-associations' to show active IKE SAsAffected if IKE is configured and active, meaning the device accepts IPsec negotiations on any interface
-
Check device model is affected platformRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' to identify the device model; confirm it is SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3, or NFX350Affected if The device is an SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3, or NFX350
The device is affected if it is a vulnerable SRX, MX (with SPC3), or NFX350 model running Junos OS version 21.2 through 22.4 or any version before 21.2, with IKE/IPsec functionality enabled and the iked process running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Apply the appropriate Junos OS patch based on the version matrix (21.2R3-S8, 21.4R3-S7, 22.1R3-S2, 22.2R3-S1, 22.3R2-S1/22.3R3, 22.4R1-S2/22.4R2/22.4R3 or later). As an interim measure, restrict IKE traffic to trusted sources using firewall policies.
Upgrade to 21.2R3-S8 / 21.4R3-S7 / 22.1R3-S2 / 22.2R3-S1 / 22.3R2-S1 or 22.3R3 / 22.4R1-S2, 22.4R2, or 22.4R3 (depending on your current branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on affected devices (SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3, NFX350) using 'show version' command
- 2. Based on the current version, plan upgrade to the appropriate fixed release:
- - If on 21.2.x: upgrade to 21.2R3-S8 or later
- - If on 21.4.x: upgrade to 21.4R3-S7 or later
- - If on 22.1.x: upgrade to 22.1R3-S2 or later
- - If on 22.2.x: upgrade to 22.2R3-S1 or later
- - If on 22.3.x: upgrade to 22.3R2-S1 or 22.3R3 or later
- - If on 22.4.x: upgrade to 22.4R1-S2, 22.4R2, or 22.4R3 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39545 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39545 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data