CVE-2024-39546
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Missing Authorization vulnerability in the Socket Intercept (SI) command file interface of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an authenticated, low-privilege local attacker to modify certain files, allowing the attacker to cause any command to execute with root privileges leading to privilege escalation ultimately compromising the system. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: * All versions prior to 21.2R3-S8-EVO, * 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S6-EVO, * 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S5-EVO, * 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S3-EVO, * 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R3-S3-EVO, * 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R3-EVO, * 23.2 versions prior to 23.2R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMissing authorization in the Socket Intercept (SI) command file interface of Junos OS Evolved allows an authenticated low-privilege local attacker to modify certain files and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges, enabling complete system compromise through privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 18.3= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version' or 'cat /etc/version' to obtain the installed Junos OS Evolved version numberAffected if The installed version matches any of these: 18.3, 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20.1, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.4
-
Verify Socket Intercept feature statusCheck if the Socket Intercept (SI) command file interface is present or enabled on the system - look for SI-related processes, modules, or configuration entriesAffected if Socket Intercept (SI) functionality is available or enabled on the device
-
Inspect for unauthorized file modificationsReview system files in /var/log and configuration directories for unexpected changes, especially files that should only be modified by privileged processesAffected if Files show modification timestamps or content changes that were not initiated by legitimate administrators
-
Check for privilege escalation indicatorsAudit system logs and process listings for commands or scripts executed by low-privilege users that resulted in root-level operationsAffected if Low-privilege user accounts show execution of root-privileged commands they should not have access to
The environment is affected if Junos OS Evolved version matches an affected release (18.3 through 21.4) AND Socket Intercept functionality is present on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches for all affected versions (21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4R3-S6-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, and 23.2R2-EVO or later). Until patches are applied, limit local access to trusted personnel and monitor for suspicious file modifications.
21.2R3-S8-EVO or later (recommended: 22.4R3-EVO or 23.2R2-EVO)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version using 'show version' command
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Backup current configuration using 'request system configuration rescue save'
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed version from Juniper support portal (21.2R3-S8-EVO or later)
- 5. Transfer the upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or SCP
- 6. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package> reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version using 'show version'
- 8. Confirm the fix is applied by checking the SI (Socket Intercept) command file permissions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39546 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39546 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data