CVE-2024-39548
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in the aftmand process of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to consume memory resources, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. The processes do not recover on their own and must be manually restarted. This issue affects both IPv4 and IPv6. Changes in memory usage can be monitored using the following CLI command: user@device> show system memory node <fpc slot> | grep evo-aftmann This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO, * 21.3 versions before 21.3R3-S5-EVO, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S5-EVO, * 22.1 versions before 22.1R3-S4-EVO, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S4-EVO, * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3-EVO, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R2-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R1-S1-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated network attacker can exploit an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the aftmand process of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved, causing excessive memory consumption that leads to denial of service. The vulnerable process does not self-recover and requires manual restart. Both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic are affected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Junos OS Evolved is runningRun 'show version' and look for 'Junos OS Evolved' in the output. This vulnerability only affects Junos OS Evolved, not regular Junos OS.Affected if The device is running Junos OS Evolved (not regular Junos OS)
-
Check installed version against affected rangesRun 'show version' and note the exact version number (e.g., 22.3R3-S2). Compare against the affected versions: all versions before 21.2, and versions 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2.Affected if The installed version is 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, or 23.2, or any version before 21.2
-
Verify aftmand process is runningRun 'show system processes' or 'ps -aux | grep aftmand' to confirm the aftmand process is active.Affected if The aftmand process is running on the device
-
Monitor aftmand memory consumptionRun 'show system memory node <fpc slot> | grep evo-aftmann' to check memory usage of the aftmand process. Alternatively, use 'show system processes extensive | match aftmann'.Affected if Memory usage for aftmand is excessively high or continuously growing
If the device runs Junos OS Evolved versions 21.2 through 23.2 (or earlier) and shows high/uncontrolled memory consumption in the aftmand process, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Upgrade to the fixed Junos OS Evolved versions specified in the advisory. As a temporary workaround, monitor memory usage using 'show system memory node <fpc slot> | grep evo-aftmann' and manually restart the process if exhaustion occurs.
Upgrade to one of the fixed releases: 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R2-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, 23.2R1-S1-EVO, or 23.2R2-EVO (or later)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version by running: show version
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version and the fixed releases (21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R2-S2-EVO/22.4R3-EVO, 23.2R1-S1-EVO/23.2R2-EVO)
- 3. Back up the current configuration using: request system configuration rescue save
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 5. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS Evolved image from supportportal.juniper.net
- 6. Upgrade the device using: request system software add <path-to-package> reboot
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version: show version
- 8. Verify the aftmand process is running properly and monitor memory: show system memory node <fpc slot> | grep evo-aftmann
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39548 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39548 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data