CVE-2024-39559
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in packet processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved may allow a network-based unauthenticated attacker to crash the device (vmcore) by sending a specific TCP packet over an established TCP session with MD5 authentication enabled, destined to an accessible port on the device, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). The receipt of this packet must occur within a specific timing window outside the attacker's control (i.e., race condition). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue only affects dual RE systems with Nonstop Active Routing (NSR) enabled. Exploitation can only occur over TCP sessions with MD5 authentication enabled (e.g., BGP with MD5 authentication). This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO, * from 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S6-EVO, * from 22.1-EVO before 22.1R3-S4-EVO, * from 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S4-EVO, * from 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-S3-EVO, * from 22.4-EVO before 22.4R2-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in Junos OS Evolved's packet processing allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash dual RE systems with NSR enabled by sending a specially crafted TCP packet over an MD5-authenticated session (e.g., BGP with MD5). The vulnerability stems from an improper check for unusual conditions during a specific timing window, causing a vmcore crash and sustained DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Junos OS Evolved is runningIdentify the device OS and version using system information commandsAffected if The device runs any version of Junos OS Evolved within the affected range (< 21.2, 21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4)
-
Verify dual Routing Engine hardwareCheck whether the system has two Routing Engines installedAffected if The system has dual RE hardware present
-
Confirm NSR is enabledInspect the Non-Stop Routing configuration statusAffected if NSR is enabled on the device
-
Identify MD5-authenticated TCP sessionsLook for configured MD5 authentication on TCP-based protocols (such as BGP with MD5)Affected if Any MD5-authenticated sessions (e.g., BGP with MD5) are configured and active
A system is affected if it runs Junos OS Evolved in the affected version range, has dual RE hardware with NSR enabled, and has MD5-authenticated TCP sessions configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Upgrade Junos OS Evolved to the fixed versions (21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4R3-S6-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R2-S2-EVO or later). Until patched, monitor for unexpected device crashes and consider disabling MD5 authentication if operationally feasible.
Upgrade to 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4R3-S6-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, or 22.4R2-S2-EVO (or later) based on your current release branch
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Verify if the device is a dual RE system with NSR enabled using 'show chassis redundancy'
- 3. Identify any TCP sessions with MD5 authentication (e.g., BGP with MD5) using 'show bgp neighbor'
- 4. Plan an upgrade to the appropriate fixed version based on current release branch
- 5. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrade will require device reboot
- 6. Download the appropriate upgrade image from Juniper support portal (e.g., 21.2R3-S8-EVO, 21.4R3-S6-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, or 22.4R2-S2-EVO)
- 7. Upload the software package to the device using 'file copy' or USB
- 8. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package> reboot'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39559 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39559 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data