CVE-2024-3970
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer Side Request Forgery vulnerability has been discovered in OpenText™ iManager 3.2.6.0200. This could lead to senstive information disclosure by directory traversal.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in OpenText™ iManager version 3.2.6.0200. The vulnerability allows an attacker to make the server perform requests to internal resources, potentially combined with directory traversal techniques to access sensitive files outside the intended directory boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0, < 3.2.6= 3.2.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed iManager versionAccess the iManager admin console or check the version file typically located at /opt/imanager/version or within the application properties. On Windows, check the installation directory or Add/Remove Programs for version information.Affected if The installed version matches 3.2.6 or falls within the range >= 3.0 and < 3.2.6 (such as 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.0 through 3.2.5.x).
-
Verify web interface is accessibleConfirm the iManager web interface is exposed and reachable by accessing the server URL on typical ports like 8080 or 8443 (e.g., https://server:8443/imanager).Affected if The iManager web interface is exposed and responds to HTTP/HTTPS requests, enabling potential SSRF exploitation through web-facing endpoints.
-
Locate features accepting URL or file path inputReview iManager configuration files (such as web.xml or application-specific XML configs in the deployment directory) for servlets, handlers, or endpoints that accept URL, path, or file parameters.Affected if URL-fetching or file-import features exist that process user-supplied URLs or paths without strict validation, creating the SSRF attack surface.
-
Check network configuration for internal accessReview network access controls, firewall rules, or iManager proxy settings to determine if the server can make outbound connections to internal resources or if internal services are reachable.Affected if The server has outbound network capability to internal resources (e.g., internal IP ranges, localhost, or internal services) which could be targeted via SSRF.
A user is affected if they are running iManager version 3.0 through 3.2.6 (including 3.2.6) with the web interface accessible and features that accept external URL or path input, as this enables the SSRF vulnerability to be exploited.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.6
Apply vendor-provided patches when available. Implement strict input validation on all user-supplied URLs and paths. Restrict outbound network access from the server and implement network segmentation to limit exposure from SSRF attacks.
OpenText iManager 3.2.7 or later (verify latest stable release on OpenText support portal)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of OpenText iManager by accessing the iManager web interface or checking the installation directory
- 2. Download the latest version of OpenText iManager from the official OpenText/MyExcelf portal or Micro Focus download site
- 3. Review the upgrade documentation for iManager to understand prerequisites and backup requirements
- 4. Create a complete backup of the iManager configuration and database before proceeding with the upgrade
- 5. Stop the iManager services to ensure a clean upgrade process
- 6. Install the upgraded version (3.2.7 or later) following the official installation/upgrade guide
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the iManager version in the web interface
- 8. Restart iManager services and confirm all components are functioning properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3970 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3970 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data