CVE-2024-39703
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn ThreatQuotient ThreatQ before 5.29.3, authenticated users are able to execute arbitrary commands by sending a crafted request to an API endpoint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThreatQuotient ThreatQ versions before 5.29.3 contain an authenticated command injection vulnerability in an API endpoint, allowing authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying system by sending specially crafted requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed ThreatQ versionLocate the ThreatQ installation and check its version information. This is typically found in the application web interface under About or System settings, or by checking the installation directory for version files.Affected if The installed version is any release before 5.29.3 (e.g., 5.29.0, 5.28.x, earlier versions).
-
Verify API endpoint accessibilityDetermine if the ThreatQ API endpoint is exposed and reachable on the network. Check network configurations, firewall rules, or reverse proxy settings that expose the /api/ path.Affected if The API endpoint is accessible from network segments where untrusted users could potentially reach it.
-
Review API authentication configurationCheck the ThreatQ authentication settings to identify which users or roles have API access privileges. Look for API key or token-based authentication configurations.Affected if There are user accounts with API access permissions, particularly those that could be compromised or used by untrusted personnel.
-
Check for suspicious command execution artifactsReview system logs, audit logs, or command execution logs on the ThreatQ server for unexpected or unauthorized shell commands, especially those originating from API requests.Affected if Unfamiliar commands appear in logs that were not initiated by legitimate administrators, indicating potential exploitation.
You are affected if your ThreatQ installation is version 5.29.2 or earlier AND the API endpoint is accessible to authenticated but untrusted users who could inject arbitrary commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to ThreatQ version 5.29.3 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Limit API access to trusted users and monitor for suspicious command execution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39703 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39703 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data