CVE-2024-39725
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights 7.0.2 and 7.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering Insights versions 7.0.2 and 7.0.3 returns detailed technical error messages directly in the browser response. This verbose error handling exposes sensitive system information such as stack traces, file paths, database details, or configuration data that could aid an attacker in reconnaissance and planning further exploitation steps.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.2= 7.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the installed version of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Optimization - Engineering InsightsAccess the application admin interface or check the product installation to confirm the exact version number (for example, through an About page or version info endpoint)Affected if The installed version is 7.0.2 or 7.0.3 (exact match required)
-
Trigger an application error conditionIntentionally cause an error in the application, such as submitting invalid input to a form, accessing a non-existent resource, or using an invalid parameter in an API requestAffected if An error is triggered and returns a response
-
Inspect the error response for sensitive informationExamine the browser response or API response when an error occurs. Look for stack traces, file paths, database connection strings, configuration details, or internal system information in the error outputAffected if The error response contains detailed technical information such as stack traces, file paths, database details, or configuration data instead of a generic error message
-
Check application error handling configuration (if accessible)Review application configuration files or settings related to error handling and message verbosity, typically found in the application admin panel or configuration directoryAffected if Detailed error messages are configured to be returned to clients or custom error pages are not implemented
A user is affected if the installed version is exactly 7.0.2 or 7.0.3 AND the application returns verbose technical error messages (including stack traces, file paths, or internal system details) to the browser or API client.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataConfigure the application to disable detailed error messages and implement custom error pages that display generic messages to end users while logging detailed errors server-side for administrator review.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39725 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data