CVE-2024-39741
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.5, 9.1.6, 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 296010.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Datacap Navigator versions 9.1.5 through 9.1.9 contain a path traversal vulnerability where the application fails to properly sanitize URL requests containing 'dot dot' sequences (/../). An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft URLs with directory traversal sequences to access files outside the web root, potentially exposing sensitive system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.1.5= 9.1.6= 9.1.7= 9.1.8= 9.1.9all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Datacap versionLocate the Datacap installation directory and check the version file or use the Datacap administration console to view the installed versionAffected if Installed version is 9.1.5, 9.1.6, 9.1.7, 9.1.8, or 9.1.9
-
Confirm IBM Datacap Navigator presenceCheck for the Navigator component in the installation or access the Navigator web URL (typically /datacapnavigator)Affected if Navigator component is present (all versions are affected)
-
Verify web interface exposureAttempt to access the Datacap or Navigator web interface over HTTP/HTTPS from an external locationAffected if The web application is accessible without authentication from the network
-
Test for path traversal vulnerabilitySend a crafted HTTP GET request containing directory traversal sequences (such as /../../../../etc/passwd or /..\..\..\windows\win.ini) to the web application endpointAffected if The application returns files from outside the web root directory or responds with sensitive system files
You are affected if IBM Datacap version 9.1.5-9.1.9 or any version of IBM Datacap Navigator is installed and the web interface is accessible, as the unsanitized path traversal sequences can be exploited.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch or upgrade to a non-vulnerable version when available. In the interim, restrict web server access via network-level controls and implement web application firewall rules to block directory traversal patterns in requests.
IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.9 fix pack or subsequent release (check IBM Fix Central for latest)
- 1. Identify your current IBM Datacap Navigator version from the About section in the application.
- 2. Navigate to IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/) to obtain the latest security patches.
- 3. Search for IBM Datacap Navigator version 9.1.9 fix pack or later that addresses CVE-2024-39741.
- 4. Download the appropriate fix pack for your specific Datacap Navigator version.
- 5. Back up your current Datacap configuration and database before applying any patches.
- 6. Apply the security patch following the instructions in the IBM fix pack documentation.
- 7. Restart the Datacap services to ensure the patch takes effect.
- 8. Verify the patch was applied successfully by checking the version information.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39741 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39741 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data