CVE-2024-39836
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 9.9.x <= 9.9.1, 9.5.x <= 9.5.7, 9.10.x <= 9.10.0 and 9.8.x <= 9.8.2 fail to ensure that remote/synthetic users cannot create sessions or reset passwords, which allows the munged email addresses, created by shared channels, to be used to receive email notifications and to reset passwords, when they are valid, functional emails.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost fails to properly restrict remote/synthetic users created through the shared channels feature from authenticating and resetting passwords. The 'munged' email addresses assigned to these synthetic users can function as valid email addresses, allowing them to receive notifications and complete password reset flows, leading to unauthorized account access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.5.0, < 9.5.8>= 9.8.0, < 9.8.3>= 9.9.0, < 9.9.2>= 9.10.0, < 9.10.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Mattermost server versionRun 'mmctl version' or look at the Mattermost System Console under About > Mattermost, or inspect the /opt/mattermost/version fileAffected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: 9.5.0-9.5.7, 9.8.0-9.8.2, 9.9.0-9.9.1, or 9.10.0
-
Verify if Shared Channels feature is enabledCheck Mattermost config.json for 'EnableSharedChannels' setting under 'ServiceSettings', or navigate to System Console > Channels > Enable Shared ChannelsAffected if Shared Channels is enabled and connected to at least one remote instance
-
Identify remote users from shared channelsQuery the database: SELECT Username, Email, RemoteId FROM Users WHERE RemoteId IS NOT NULL; or use mmctl: 'mmctl user list --json' and filter for users with email addresses containing patterns like @remote.xxxAffected if There exist users with remote IDs or email addresses in the format used for shared channel participants (typically containing @proxy. or similar munged patterns)
-
Check for password reset activity by remote usersReview Mattermost logs for password reset events: grep -i 'password reset' /var/log/mattermost/*.log and correlate with remote user accountsAffected if Password reset tokens have been issued to or used by remote/synthetic user accounts
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable Mattermost version with Shared Channels enabled and have remote/synthetic users in their system who were able to receive password reset tokens or establish sessions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.89.8.39.9.2
Upgrade to Mattermost versions 9.9.2, 9.5.8, 9.10.1, 9.8.3 or later. These versions contain fixes to prevent remote/synthetic users from creating sessions or resetting passwords using their munged email addresses.
9.5.8, 9.8.3, 9.9.2, or 9.10.1 (depending on current version branch)
- Identify the currently installed Mattermost version from the affected list (9.5.0-9.5.7, 9.8.0-9.8.2, 9.9.0-9.9.1, or 9.10.0-9.10.0)
- Upgrade to the corresponding fixed version: 9.5.8 if on 9.5.x, 9.8.3 if on 9.8.x, 9.9.2 if on 9.9.x, or 9.10.1 if on 9.10.x
- Follow standard Mattermost upgrade procedures (backup database, test in staging environment before production)
- After upgrade, verify that remote/synthetic users (from shared channels) can no longer reset passwords or create sessions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39836 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39836 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data