CVE-2024-39844
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn ZNC before 1.9.1, remote code execution can occur in modtcl via a KICK.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceZNC versions before 1.9.1 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the modtcl module where specially crafted KICK commands can be processed unsafely, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed ZNC versionRun `znc --version` or check the ZNC service version through your package manager (e.g., `dpkg -l znc`, `rpm -qi znc`, or `znc --version`). Compare the version number to 1.9.1.Affected if The installed version is before 1.9.1 (e.g., 1.9.0, 1.8.x, or earlier).
-
Identify if modtcl module is loadedCheck your ZNC configuration file (typically ~/.znc/configs/znc.conf or /etc/znc/znc.conf) for the modtcl module listed under LoadModule settings, or run `znc --makepass` and examine loaded modules via the control panel if accessible.Affected if The modtcl module is present in the LoadModule list or is actively loaded in your ZNC instance.
-
Verify modtcl module is reachable via IRCIf modtcl is loaded, confirm it can process KICK commands from any IRC channel where ZNC is present. This is a functional check: if the module handles KICK events, it processes them unsafely when crafted maliciously.Affected if The modtcl module is loaded and capable of processing KICK commands from remote users on any channel where ZNC operates.
You are affected if your ZNC version is earlier than 1.9.1 AND the modtcl module is loaded and operational in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade ZNC to version 1.9.1 or later. If the modtcl module is not required, consider disabling it as a defense-in-depth measure until the upgrade can be applied.
ZNC 1.9.1 or later
- 1. Check current ZNC version: znc --version
- 2. Backup ZNC configuration directory (typically ~/.znc or /etc/znc)
- 3. Download ZNC 1.9.1 or later from the official GitHub releases: https://github.com/znc/znc/releases
- 4. Stop the running ZNC service: systemctl stop znc or pkill znc
- 5. Install the new ZNC version using your system's package manager or compile from source
- 6. Verify the installation: znc --version (should show 1.9.1 or higher)
- 7. Start ZNC service: systemctl start znc or znc
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39844 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39844 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data