CVE-2024-39925
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Vaultwarden (formerly Bitwarden_RS) 1.30.3. It lacks an offboarding process for members who leave an organization. As a result, the shared organization key is not rotated when a member departs. Consequently, the departing member, whose access should be revoked, retains a copy of the organization key. Additionally, the application fails to adequately protect some encrypted data stored on the server. Consequently, an authenticated user could gain unauthorized access to encrypted data of any organization, even if the user is not a member of the targeted organization. However, the user would need to know the corresponding organizationId. Hence, if a user (whose access to an organization has been revoked) already possesses the organization key, that user could use the key to decrypt the leaked data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVaultwarden 1.30.3 lacks a member offboarding process - when members leave an organization, the shared organization encryption key is not rotated, allowing former members to retain the key. Additionally, the application inadequately protects encrypted data, enabling any authenticated user who knows an organizationId to access that organization's encrypted data without proper authorization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.30.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Vaultwarden versionCheck the running Vaultwarden instance version (typically via /admin diagnostics page, API endpoint, or container image tag)Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.30.3
-
Verify member offboarding key rotationReview Vaultwarden source code or configuration for any function that rotates the organization's symmetric encryption key when a member is removed from an organizationAffected if No key rotation logic exists or is triggered upon member removal
-
Check organization data access controlsTest whether an authenticated user from one organization can access another organization's encrypted data by directly querying with a known organizationId (via API or internal function calls)Affected if Users can access encrypted data belonging to organizations they are not a member of by supplying the organizationId
You are affected if running Vaultwarden 1.30.3 AND your organization lacks proper member offboarding with key rotation OR allows unauthorized access to encrypted organization data based on knowledge of organizationId.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper member offboarding that rotates organization keys upon departure and add access controls to prevent unauthorized access to encrypted organization data regardless of whether the user knows the organizationId.
Vaultwarden 1.30.4 or later
- 1. Backup your current Vaultwarden instance and database before upgrading
- 2. Stop the Vaultwarden service
- 3. Update Vaultwarden to version 1.30.4 or later
- 4. Restart the Vaultwarden service
- 5. Verify the service is running correctly
- 6. Test that user offboarding now properly handles organization key rotation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39925 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data