CVE-2024-39936
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in HTTP2 in Qt before 5.15.18, 6.x before 6.2.13, 6.3.x through 6.5.x before 6.5.7, and 6.6.x through 6.7.x before 6.7.3. Code to make security-relevant decisions about an established connection may execute too early, because the encrypted() signal has not yet been emitted and processed..
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceQt's HTTP/2 implementation has a timing vulnerability where security-relevant decisions about an established connection execute before the encrypted() signal is emitted and processed. This means code making TLS/encryption verification decisions may run on a connection that hasn't completed its security handshake, potentially allowing premature or insecure decisions on unverified connections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.15.18>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.13>= 6.3.0, < 6.5.7>= 6.6.0, < 6.7.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Qt installation and versionRun 'qmake --version' or check the Qt library files (libQt5Core.so or libQt6Core.so) using 'ldd' or 'file' to locate the installed Qt version. On Linux, also check /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake or similar package metadata.Affected if The installed Qt version is less than 5.15.18, or between 6.0.0 and 6.2.12, or between 6.3.0 and 6.5.6, or between 6.6.0 and 6.7.2.
-
Verify HTTP/2 support is compiled inCheck if the Qt build includes HTTP/2 support by examining QHttp2Configuration availability. In code, test if QNetworkRequest::Http2Allowed attribute is settable. Or check for 'QHttp2Configuration' class existence in the Qt installation headers or libraries.Affected if Qt is built with HTTP/2 support enabled (the vulnerability only affects HTTP/2 connections).
-
Check for encrypted() signal usage in application codeSearch source code for connections to QNetworkAccessManager::encrypted() signal or QSslSocket::encrypted() signal. Look for patterns like 'connect(manager, &QNetworkAccessManager::encrypted, ...)' or similar signal-slot connections that perform TLS verification.Affected if Application code connects to the encrypted() signal to make security decisions about TLS/encryption verification.
-
Inspect QNetworkAccessManager SSL configurationExamine the application code or configuration where QNetworkAccessManager is instantiated and check if custom QSslConfiguration is applied, particularly if encryption verification logic is tied to connection establishment.Affected if Code performs TLS certificate verification or other security decisions in connection handlers that may race with HTTP/2 stream establishment.
You are affected if your Qt version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND your application uses HTTP/2 with code that relies on the encrypted() signal for security decisions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.15.186.2.136.5.7
Upgrade Qt to version 5.15.18 or later, 6.2.13 or later, 6.5.7 or later, or 6.7.3 or later to ensure security decisions execute only after the encrypted() signal is properly emitted and processed.
Qt 5.15.18, 6.2.13, 6.5.7, or 6.7.3 depending on your current major branch
- 1. Identify the current Qt version in use by checking project dependencies or Qt version macros (qVersion())
- 2. For Qt 5.15.x users: Upgrade to Qt 5.15.18 which contains the fix
- 3. For Qt 6.0.x - 6.2.x users: Upgrade to Qt 6.2.13 or later
- 4. For Qt 6.3.x - 6.5.x users: Upgrade to Qt 6.5.7 or later
- 5. For Qt 6.6.x - 6.7.x users: Upgrade to Qt 6.7.3 or later
- 6. Rebuild the application with the new Qt version
- 7. Test HTTP/2 functionality to verify the encrypted() signal now behaves correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39936 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39936 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data