CVE-2024-39954
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in eventmesh-runtime module in WebhookUtil.java on windows\linux\mac os e.g. allows the attacker can abuse functionality on the server to read or update internal resources. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.12.0 or use the master branch , which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the eventmesh-runtime module's WebhookUtil.java allows attackers to abuse server functionality to make the server read or update internal resources. The vulnerability affects Windows, Linux, and macOS platforms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.12.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Apache EventMesh versionCheck the version file or build artifact in the EventMesh installation directory. Common locations: version file in conf/ folder, or check the jar/war file metadata (META-INF/MANIFEST.MF or build properties).Affected if Version is less than 1.12.0 (any 1.x.x version before 1.12.0)
-
Locate WebhookUtil.java in the deploymentSearch the eventmesh-runtime jar or source code for WebhookUtil.java. In deployed systems, check the classpath or libs folder for eventmesh-runtime-{version}.jar and verify if the WebhookUtil class exists.Affected if WebhookUtil class exists in the eventmesh-runtime module (vulnerable code present)
-
Determine if webhook configuration is enabledInspect EventMesh configuration files (eventmesh.properties or eventmesh-conf.properties) for webhook-related settings. Look for keys containing 'webhook' or 'hook' that enable or configure webhook functionality.Affected if Webhook feature is enabled in the configuration (any webhook.* properties set to true or pointing to valid endpoints)
-
Check for exposed webhook endpointsReview network listeners and HTTP server configurations. Look for endpoints registered under /webhook/ path or similar webhook-related URL patterns in the HTTP server configuration.Affected if HTTP endpoints accepting webhook requests are exposed (particularly unauthenticated or weakly authenticated webhook handlers)
-
Verify webhook callback URLs are configurableExamine the webhook configuration files for 'callback' or 'notify' URL settings that control where webhook requests are sent. Check if these can be configured to internal network addresses.Affected if Webhook callback URLs are configurable and can be set to arbitrary addresses (enabling SSRF exploitation)
You are affected if running Apache EventMesh version less than 1.12.0 AND the webhook feature is enabled with configurable callback URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.12.0
Upgrade to Apache EventMesh version 1.12.0 or apply the fix from the master branch to address the SSRF vulnerability in WebhookUtil.java.
EventMesh 1.12.0
- 1. Back up your current EventMesh installation and configuration data
- 2. Download Apache EventMesh version 1.12.0 from the official Apache distribution repository
- 3. Stop the running EventMesh service
- 4. Replace the existing EventMesh installation with the new version 1.12.0
- 5. Restore or reapply your custom configuration settings
- 6. Start the EventMesh service and verify it functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39954 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39954 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data