CVE-2024-4040
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA server side template injection vulnerability in CrushFTP in all versions before 10.7.1 and 11.1.0 on all platforms allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read files from the filesystem outside of the VFS Sandbox, bypass authentication to gain administrative access, and perform remote code execution on the server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a server-side template injection (SSTI) vulnerability in CrushFTP affecting all versions before 10.7.1 and 11.1.0. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to escape the VFS sandbox, read arbitrary files from the filesystem, bypass authentication to gain administrative access, and achieve remote code execution on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0, < 10.7.1>= 11.0.0, < 11.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm CrushFTP installationLook for CrushFTP directories (commonly /opt/CrushFTP12/ on Linux or C:\CrushFTP12\ on Windows) or check running services for CrushFTP processesAffected if CrushFTP software is present on the system
-
Identify installed versionCheck the web interface login page for the version number, or examine the crushftp.config/prefs.xml configuration file in the installation directory for a version attributeAffected if The installed version falls within 10.0.0 to 10.7.0 (inclusive) or 11.0.0 to 11.1.0 (exclusive)
-
Verify web interface accessibilityCheck if the CrushFTP web interface (default ports 8080, 8443, or 80/443) is reachable from the networkAffected if The management interface is network-accessible (this is required for unauthenticated exploitation)
-
Inspect for unauthorized access indicatorsReview CrushFTP access logs for unusual requests to template endpoints, unexpected authentication bypass events, or administrative actions from unauthenticated sourcesAffected if Logs show template injection patterns or authentication bypass activity
You are affected if CrushFTP versions 10.0.0-10.7.0 or 11.0.0-11.1.0 are running with an exposed web interface, since the SSTI flaw allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication and execute code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.7.111.1.0
Upgrade CrushFTP to version 10.7.1 or 11.1.0 or later immediately. If patching cannot be performed quickly, restrict network access to the CrushFTP service to prevent unauthenticated exploitation.
CrushFTP 10.7.1 (for 10.x branches) or CrushFTP 11.1.0 (for 11.x branches)
- 1. Identify the currently running CrushFTP version in your environment
- 2. If running version 10.x (>= 10.0.0 and < 10.7.1), upgrade to version 10.7.1 or later
- 3. If running version 11.x (>= 11.0.0 and < 11.1.0), upgrade to version 11.1.0 or later
- 4. Download the appropriate updated version from the official CrushFTP download page
- 5. Apply the upgrade following CrushFTP's standard upgrade procedure
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful and the service is running correctly
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is no longer exploitable by reviewing system logs for any suspicious activity around the time of discovery
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4040 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4040 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data